Latvian vs Dutch Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 219,904,345 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Dutch within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.611. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.489% in Dutch. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 489.3 Dutch.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Dutch communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,649 compared to $42,605, a difference of 23.6%), median family income ($120,301 compared to $101,192, a difference of 18.9%), and median female earnings ($43,941 compared to $37,339, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $51,265, a difference of 3.0%), wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 6.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($67,326 compared to $59,539, a difference of 13.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Dutch communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.8% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 16.7%), single female poverty (19.0% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 15.9%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.5% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 2.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 3.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Dutch communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 21.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 19.9%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Dutch communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 12.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 78.4%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Dutch communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 20.4%), births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 31.5%, a difference of 13.7%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.11 compared to 3.11, a difference of 0.12%), currently married (48.5% compared to 49.6%, a difference of 2.3%), and married-couple households (47.9% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Dutch communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 43.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 25.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 3.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 61.6%, a difference of 9.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 18.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Dutch communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.2% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 54.7%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 45.3%), and master's degree (19.8% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 43.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (95.6% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.040%), 9th grade (96.4% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.12%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.14%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Dutch communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 28.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 21.1%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.76%), disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 3.1%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 5.8%).