Latvian vs Immigrants from Cuba Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,098,468 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cuba within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.053. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.021% in Immigrants from Cuba. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to a decrease of 21.5 Immigrants from Cuba.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($120,301 compared to $78,249, a difference of 53.7%), per capita income ($52,649 compared to $34,910, a difference of 50.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($67,326 compared to $44,735, a difference of 50.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $50,374, a difference of 4.8%), wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 24.7%), and median female earnings ($43,941 compared to $33,291, a difference of 32.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 128.3%), married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 91.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 89.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 0.62%), single male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 3.9%), and single female poverty (19.0% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 11.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 15.4%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 14.9%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.32%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.85%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 28.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 72.0%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.50%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 49.5%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 42.4%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 32.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.4% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 1.3%), average family size (3.11 compared to 3.26, a difference of 5.1%), and married-couple households (47.9% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 12.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 8.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 119.0%), no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 82.9%), and master's degree (19.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 82.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 27.5%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 25.2%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 1.8%), disability (11.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and male disability (11.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 2.1%).