Latvian vs South American Indian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Latvian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
South American Indian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Latvians

South American Indians

Exceptional
Average
9,576
SOCIAL INDEX
93.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
12th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,820
SOCIAL INDEX
45.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
193rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

South American Indian Integration in Latvian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,947,426 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of South American Indians within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.949. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.588% in South American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 588.4 South American Indians.
Latvian Integration in South American Indian Communities

Latvian vs South American Indian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,649 compared to $44,206, a difference of 19.1%), median male earnings ($63,498 compared to $54,508, a difference of 16.5%), and median family income ($120,301 compared to $103,624, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $52,979, a difference of 0.37%), householder income over 65 years ($67,326 compared to $62,215, a difference of 8.2%), and median female earnings ($43,941 compared to $40,019, a difference of 9.8%).
Latvian vs South American Indian Income
Income MetricLatvianSouth American Indian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$52,649
Good
$44,206
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$120,301
Good
$103,624
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$97,311
Excellent
$87,446
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$53,001
Good
$46,952
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$63,498
Average
$54,508
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,941
Good
$40,019
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Excellent
$52,783
Excellent
$52,979
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$108,926
Good
$96,497
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$115,957
Good
$101,171
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$67,326
Good
$62,215
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.9%
Exceptional
24.7%

Latvian vs South American Indian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 36.7%), receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 30.2%), and family poverty (7.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 3.3%), single male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 4.6%), and single father poverty (16.5% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 4.7%).
Latvian vs South American Indian Poverty
Poverty MetricLatvianSouth American Indian
Poverty
Exceptional
10.5%
Fair
12.7%
Families
Exceptional
7.1%
Fair
9.1%
Males
Exceptional
9.6%
Fair
11.5%
Females
Exceptional
11.4%
Fair
13.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.5%
Average
20.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.8%
Average
13.5%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Average
17.4%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.2%
Average
16.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.4%
Average
16.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.5%
Fair
16.8%
Single Males
Good
12.7%
Exceptional
12.1%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.0%
Good
20.6%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Exceptional
15.7%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.9%
Average
29.3%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.9%
Fair
5.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.5%
Poor
11.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
12.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.1%
Average
11.9%

Latvian vs South American Indian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 18.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 17.2%), and unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 4.6%).
Latvian vs South American Indian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLatvianSouth American Indian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.5%
Males
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.5%
Females
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.5%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
12.1%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Poor
18.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Tragic
10.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Fair
6.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Fair
5.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Average
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
4.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Good
4.8%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
5.5%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Poor
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Excellent
8.6%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.8%
Tragic
7.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Fair
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.9%
Fair
5.5%

Latvian vs South American Indian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 8.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 0.81%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.81%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.0%).
Latvian vs South American Indian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLatvianSouth American Indian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.5%
Exceptional
66.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.5%
Excellent
79.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.9%
Poor
35.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.1%
Good
75.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.1%
Fair
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
86.0%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.4%
Good
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.8%
Good
82.9%

Latvian vs South American Indian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 21.7%), births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 14.5%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.7%), family households (62.8% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 3.0%), and married-couple households (47.9% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 4.0%).
Latvian vs South American Indian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLatvianSouth American Indian
Family Households
Tragic
62.8%
Excellent
64.6%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.4%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.9%
Fair
46.0%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.11
Exceptional
3.26
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Excellent
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Fair
6.4%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.5%
Poor
45.8%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.8%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.7%
Average
31.7%

Latvian vs South American Indian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 23.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 4.4%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 88.0%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 0.95%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 2.4%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 88.0%, a difference of 2.6%).
Latvian vs South American Indian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLatvianSouth American Indian
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.8%
Tragic
12.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.3%
Tragic
88.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
56.2%
Tragic
53.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.3%
Fair
19.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.1%
Average
6.3%

Latvian vs South American Indian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 45.1%), professional degree (6.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 31.3%), and doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 30.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.74%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.75%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.76%).
Latvian vs South American Indian Education Level
Education Level MetricLatvianSouth American Indian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Poor
2.2%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.8%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.8%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.7%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.7%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.5%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
96.7%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Tragic
95.5%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Tragic
95.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Tragic
94.3%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.6%
Tragic
93.1%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.7%
Tragic
92.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.6%
Poor
90.6%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
92.0%
Poor
88.5%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
89.2%
Fair
85.2%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
71.6%
Average
65.5%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.1%
Good
60.0%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
53.9%
Good
47.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
46.1%
Excellent
39.3%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
19.8%
Excellent
15.9%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.2%
Excellent
4.8%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.6%
Excellent
2.0%

Latvian vs South American Indian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 11.8%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 8.9%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.33%), female disability (11.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.85%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.1%).
Latvian vs South American Indian Disability
Disability MetricLatvianSouth American Indian
Disability
Excellent
11.4%
Exceptional
11.4%
Males
Good
11.1%
Excellent
10.9%
Females
Exceptional
11.7%
Exceptional
11.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Excellent
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Poor
6.8%
Excellent
6.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.2%
Excellent
10.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.2%
Good
23.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.1%
Good
47.1%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Average
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.6%
Poor
17.5%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.7%
Exceptional
5.9%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Excellent
2.4%