Latvian vs Immigrants from Jordan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 116,807,353 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jordan within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.592. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.085% in Immigrants from Jordan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 84.8 Immigrants from Jordan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,649 compared to $45,066, a difference of 16.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($108,926 compared to $97,185, a difference of 12.1%), and median family income ($120,301 compared to $107,715, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $51,370, a difference of 2.8%), wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 6.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($67,326 compared to $63,041, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 31.2%), family poverty (7.1% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 20.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.2% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (26.9% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 0.90%), single male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and single female poverty (19.0% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 10.5%), female unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 9.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.16%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.27%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 5.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 0.61%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.62%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.85%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 14.4%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 9.4%), and family households with children (26.4% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.040%), married-couple households (47.9% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 0.50%), and currently married (48.5% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 13.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 6.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 1.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 31.7%), no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 31.6%), and doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.54%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.55%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 15.8%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 11.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.30%), female disability (11.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 2.1%).