Latvian vs Cajun Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,127,927 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Cajuns within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.451. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.216% in Cajuns. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 215.7 Cajuns.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,649 compared to $37,527, a difference of 40.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($115,957 compared to $83,015, a difference of 39.7%), and median family income ($120,301 compared to $87,157, a difference of 38.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $45,338, a difference of 16.4%), median male earnings ($63,498 compared to $52,325, a difference of 21.3%), and wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 21.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.8% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 68.9%), family poverty (7.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 67.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.2% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 67.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 25.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 29.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 31.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 45.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 35.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 33.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.9%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 6.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 7.2%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 6.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 41.0%, a difference of 47.7%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 38.8%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.11 compared to 3.17, a difference of 2.2%), currently married (48.5% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 2.9%), and family households (62.8% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 16.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 2.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 57.7%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 0.020%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 57.7%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.2% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 85.2%), master's degree (19.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 80.7%), and doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 77.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.15%), 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.16%), and 2nd grade (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.16%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 54.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 50.8%), and ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 35.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 7.0%), disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 50.7%, a difference of 12.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 19.5%).