Latvian vs Japanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,081,667 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Japanese within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.013. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Japanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 5.2 Japanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,649 compared to $39,870, a difference of 32.1%), median family income ($120,301 compared to $97,288, a difference of 23.6%), and median male earnings ($63,498 compared to $51,473, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $52,365, a difference of 0.80%), median female earnings ($43,941 compared to $38,528, a difference of 14.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($67,326 compared to $57,919, a difference of 16.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 54.5%), married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 42.5%), and family poverty (7.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 39.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 3.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 3.5%), and single mother poverty (26.9% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 20.8%), unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 19.9%), and female unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.61%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.79%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 3.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 0.45%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 40.1%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 37.2%), and births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 35.2%, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 3.1%), family households (62.8% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 5.0%), and married-couple households (47.9% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 25.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 12.9%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 0.31%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 117.1%), professional degree (6.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 76.0%), and doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 69.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.9%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 21.4%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 21.2%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 0.27%), male disability (11.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 5.9%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 6.5%).