Latvian vs West Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,004,271 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of West Indians within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.696. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.102% in West Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 102.0 West Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and West Indian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 42.4%), median family income ($120,301 compared to $92,765, a difference of 29.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($115,957 compared to $89,906, a difference of 29.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $51,583, a difference of 2.3%), median female earnings ($43,941 compared to $40,317, a difference of 9.0%), and median earnings ($53,001 compared to $45,132, a difference of 17.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and West Indian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 78.2%), married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 63.6%), and family poverty (7.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 62.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 8.2%), single male poverty (12.7% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 9.3%), and single father poverty (16.5% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and West Indian communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (4.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 37.5%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 35.1%), and unemployment (4.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 35.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 2.4%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 7.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and West Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 24.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 71.3%, a difference of 6.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.0% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and West Indian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 48.4%), births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 34.4%), and married-couple households (47.9% compared to 40.3%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.8% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 0.47%), family households with children (26.4% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 0.57%), and average family size (3.11 compared to 3.29, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and West Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 142.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 44.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 40.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 76.4%, a difference of 18.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 36.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 40.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and West Indian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 61.8%), no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 60.8%), and professional degree (6.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 54.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.0%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.0%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and West Indian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 21.5%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 20.2%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (11.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 3.2%), disability (11.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 6.5%), and disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 7.7%).