Latvian vs Immigrants from Chile Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 136,345,619 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.919. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.203% in Immigrants from Chile. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 1,203.1 Immigrants from Chile.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,649 compared to $46,213, a difference of 13.9%), median family income ($120,301 compared to $105,655, a difference of 13.9%), and median male earnings ($63,498 compared to $55,954, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $52,440, a difference of 0.65%), householder income over 65 years ($67,326 compared to $62,354, a difference of 8.0%), and wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 35.6%), receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 25.9%), and family poverty (7.1% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 25.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 0.33%), single male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 4.9%), and single father poverty (16.5% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 13.5%), female unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 11.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 11.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.58%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.62%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 18.3%), births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 12.5%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.8% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 2.9%), married-couple households (47.9% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 2.9%), and average family size (3.11 compared to 3.24, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 12.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 3.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.81%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 41.2%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 22.4%), and professional degree (6.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.67%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.68%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.68%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 13.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 11.8%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.010%), ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.060%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.47%).