Latvian vs Blackfeet Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 154,626,880 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Blackfeet within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.885. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.344% in Blackfeet. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 344.1 Blackfeet.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,649 compared to $37,695, a difference of 39.7%), median family income ($120,301 compared to $88,717, a difference of 35.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($115,957 compared to $86,595, a difference of 33.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $48,603, a difference of 8.6%), wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 10.4%), and median female earnings ($43,941 compared to $35,864, a difference of 22.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.1% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 59.0%), married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 58.2%), and receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 56.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.5% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 12.5%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 21.2%), and single male poverty (12.7% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 22.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 30.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 28.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 6.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 4.7%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 0.76%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 41.6%), births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 36.7%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 34.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.8% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 1.3%), family households with children (26.4% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 3.9%), and average family size (3.11 compared to 3.24, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 14.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 8.4%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 56.4%, a difference of 0.23%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 0.26%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 79.7%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 71.3%), and master's degree (19.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 63.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.40%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.41%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 38.2%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 32.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 8.1%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 9.7%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 13.1%).