Latvian vs Central American Community Comparison

COMPARE

Latvian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Central American
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Latvians

Central Americans

Exceptional
Poor
9,576
SOCIAL INDEX
93.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
12th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,952
SOCIAL INDEX
17.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
278th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Central American Integration in Latvian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,266,865 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Central Americans within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.066. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.051% in Central Americans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 50.7 Central Americans.
Latvian Integration in Central American Communities

Latvian vs Central American Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Central American communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,649 compared to $38,560, a difference of 36.5%), median family income ($120,301 compared to $91,087, a difference of 32.1%), and median male earnings ($63,498 compared to $48,093, a difference of 32.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $52,626, a difference of 0.30%), householder income over 65 years ($67,326 compared to $56,321, a difference of 19.5%), and median female earnings ($43,941 compared to $36,492, a difference of 20.4%).
Latvian vs Central American Income
Income MetricLatvianCentral American
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$52,649
Tragic
$38,560
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$120,301
Tragic
$91,087
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$97,311
Tragic
$78,803
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$53,001
Tragic
$42,280
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$63,498
Tragic
$48,093
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,941
Tragic
$36,492
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Excellent
$52,783
Good
$52,626
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$108,926
Tragic
$85,144
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$115,957
Tragic
$90,951
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$67,326
Tragic
$56,321
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.9%
Exceptional
23.1%

Latvian vs Central American Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Central American communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 72.9%), family poverty (7.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 58.6%), and receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 55.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 2.1%), single father poverty (16.5% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 3.2%), and single male poverty (12.7% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 3.8%).
Latvian vs Central American Poverty
Poverty MetricLatvianCentral American
Poverty
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
14.6%
Families
Exceptional
7.1%
Tragic
11.2%
Males
Exceptional
9.6%
Tragic
13.2%
Females
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
16.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.5%
Good
19.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.8%
Tragic
15.5%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Tragic
20.6%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.2%
Tragic
20.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.4%
Tragic
20.1%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.5%
Tragic
20.2%
Single Males
Good
12.7%
Poor
13.2%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.0%
Tragic
23.0%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Excellent
16.0%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.9%
Tragic
31.8%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.9%
Tragic
6.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
13.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
14.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
14.1%

Latvian vs Central American Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Central American communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 27.1%), female unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 26.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 2.3%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 6.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 8.1%).
Latvian vs Central American Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLatvianCentral American
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.7%
Males
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.9%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
12.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Tragic
18.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Tragic
10.6%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
4.8%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Good
4.8%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.5%
Seniors > 75
Excellent
8.6%
Average
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.8%
Tragic
8.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
9.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.2%

Latvian vs Central American Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Central American communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 11.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.85%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 1.8%).
Latvian vs Central American Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLatvianCentral American
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.5%
Exceptional
66.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.5%
Tragic
79.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.9%
Tragic
34.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.1%
Average
75.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.1%
Tragic
83.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
86.0%
Tragic
84.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.4%
Tragic
83.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.8%
Tragic
81.7%

Latvian vs Central American Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Central American communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 43.9%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 42.3%), and births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 32.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 4.7%), family households (62.8% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 5.2%), and married-couple households (47.9% compared to 43.9%, a difference of 9.0%).
Latvian vs Central American Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLatvianCentral American
Family Households
Tragic
62.8%
Exceptional
66.0%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.4%
Exceptional
29.1%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.9%
Tragic
43.9%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.11
Exceptional
3.41
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.9%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
7.6%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.5%
Tragic
43.3%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.6%
Fair
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.7%
Tragic
36.7%

Latvian vs Central American Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Central American communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 16.2%), no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 10.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 1.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 2.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 6.1%).
Latvian vs Central American Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLatvianCentral American
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.8%
Fair
10.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.3%
Fair
89.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
56.2%
Fair
54.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.3%
Exceptional
20.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.1%
Exceptional
7.1%

Latvian vs Central American Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Central American communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 120.3%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 76.9%), and professional degree (6.2% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 74.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 2.0%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 2.0%).
Latvian vs Central American Education Level
Education Level MetricLatvianCentral American
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Tragic
3.4%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
96.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
96.6%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
96.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
96.4%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
96.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
95.5%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
95.1%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
94.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Tragic
92.1%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Tragic
91.6%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Tragic
90.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.6%
Tragic
88.4%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.7%
Tragic
86.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.6%
Tragic
85.2%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
92.0%
Tragic
82.5%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
89.2%
Tragic
79.2%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
71.6%
Tragic
57.7%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.1%
Tragic
52.1%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
53.9%
Tragic
39.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
46.1%
Tragic
31.9%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
19.8%
Tragic
12.2%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
3.6%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.6%
Tragic
1.5%

Latvian vs Central American Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Central American communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 18.4%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 17.2%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.56%), female disability (11.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.8%).
Latvian vs Central American Disability
Disability MetricLatvianCentral American
Disability
Excellent
11.4%
Exceptional
11.4%
Males
Good
11.1%
Exceptional
10.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.7%
Exceptional
11.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Excellent
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Excellent
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Poor
6.8%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.2%
Average
11.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.2%
Tragic
25.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.1%
Tragic
48.8%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
2.7%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.6%
Tragic
17.7%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.7%
Good
6.0%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.5%