Latvian vs Ugandan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,303,154 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Ugandans within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.004. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Ugandans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 1.9 Ugandans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,649 compared to $45,047, a difference of 16.9%), wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 15.9%), and median male earnings ($63,498 compared to $55,290, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $50,923, a difference of 3.6%), median female earnings ($43,941 compared to $40,889, a difference of 7.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($67,326 compared to $61,177, a difference of 10.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 36.9%), receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 34.3%), and family poverty (7.1% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 31.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.5% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 1.3%), single male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and single mother poverty (26.9% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 39.8%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 20.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.70%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.84%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 0.94%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.0% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 0.34%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 0.050%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.090%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 22.9%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 15.5%), and currently married (48.5% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.5%), family households (62.8% compared to 61.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and family households with children (26.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 16.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 8.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 5.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 32.9%), professional degree (6.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 22.1%), and doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.53%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.54%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 15.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 14.1%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.22%), ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.27%), and female disability (11.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.2%).