Latvian vs Indonesian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 111,562,326 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Indonesians within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.167. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.353% in Indonesians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 352.8 Indonesians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Indonesian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,649 compared to $37,300, a difference of 41.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($108,926 compared to $79,543, a difference of 36.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($115,957 compared to $84,890, a difference of 36.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $45,566, a difference of 15.8%), median female earnings ($43,941 compared to $36,140, a difference of 21.6%), and wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 22.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Indonesian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 62.4%), family poverty (7.1% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 60.0%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.2% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 59.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.5% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 5.8%), single male poverty (12.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 11.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Indonesian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 16.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 13.7%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.67%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Indonesian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 40.7%, a difference of 4.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.0% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 77.2%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Indonesian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 41.6%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 27.9%), and births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.8% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 2.1%), average family size (3.11 compared to 3.28, a difference of 5.5%), and family households with children (26.4% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Indonesian communities in the United States are seen in 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 5.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 53.4%, a difference of 5.4%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 0.67%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 2.8%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Indonesian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 108.1%), professional degree (6.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 70.1%), and doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 61.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (98.4% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.8%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Indonesian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 30.1%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 17.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (11.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 5.7%), and disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 6.8%).