Latvian vs Immigrants from Uruguay Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,056,989 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uruguay within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.913. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.394% in Immigrants from Uruguay. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 1,393.9 Immigrants from Uruguay.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($120,301 compared to $98,205, a difference of 22.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($115,957 compared to $96,086, a difference of 20.7%), and median male earnings ($63,498 compared to $52,860, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $52,302, a difference of 0.92%), median female earnings ($43,941 compared to $38,945, a difference of 12.8%), and wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 13.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 46.5%), receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 37.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 35.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 3.4%), single father poverty (16.5% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 5.7%), and single male poverty (12.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 20.6%), female unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 17.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.3%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.0% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 13.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.58%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 0.70%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.75%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 27.5%), births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 22.3%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.8% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 1.8%), family households with children (26.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 3.5%), and average family size (3.11 compared to 3.23, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 21.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 13.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 51.4%, a difference of 9.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 12.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 52.9%), no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 50.8%), and professional degree (6.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 36.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.84%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.84%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.85%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 16.6%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 12.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.18%), disability (11.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 1.7%).