Latvian vs Immigrants from Mexico Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 211,996,571 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Mexico within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.488. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.463% in Immigrants from Mexico. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 463.0 Immigrants from Mexico.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,649 compared to $33,931, a difference of 55.2%), median family income ($120,301 compared to $83,639, a difference of 43.8%), and median male earnings ($63,498 compared to $44,960, a difference of 41.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $50,422, a difference of 4.7%), wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 10.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($67,326 compared to $52,801, a difference of 27.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 94.4%), family poverty (7.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 73.5%), and receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 66.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.5% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 2.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 3.9%), and single male poverty (12.7% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 10.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 35.1%), female unemployment (4.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 34.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 33.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 7.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 9.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 10.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 35.1%, a difference of 10.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 54.4%), single father households (2.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 51.5%), and births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 35.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.9% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 3.1%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 3.8%), and currently married (48.5% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 47.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 27.6%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 1.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 7.0%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 20.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 136.3%), professional degree (6.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 136.1%), and doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 133.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 2.2%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 27.7%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 26.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (11.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 3.8%), disability (11.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 3.8%), and female disability (11.7% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 3.9%).