Latvian vs Korean Community Comparison

COMPARE

Latvian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Korean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Latvians

Koreans

Exceptional
Good
9,576
SOCIAL INDEX
93.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
12th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,713
SOCIAL INDEX
64.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
147th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Korean Integration in Latvian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,960,405 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Koreans within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.237. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.172% in Koreans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 172.0 Koreans.
Latvian Integration in Korean Communities

Latvian vs Korean Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Korean communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,649 compared to $44,522, a difference of 18.2%), median male earnings ($63,498 compared to $56,672, a difference of 12.0%), and wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($67,326 compared to $67,472, a difference of 0.22%), median household income ($97,311 compared to $95,018, a difference of 2.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($108,926 compared to $103,824, a difference of 4.9%).
Latvian vs Korean Income
Income MetricLatvianKorean
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$52,649
Good
$44,522
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$120,301
Exceptional
$110,103
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$97,311
Exceptional
$95,018
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$53,001
Exceptional
$48,727
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$63,498
Excellent
$56,672
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,941
Exceptional
$41,276
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Excellent
$52,783
Exceptional
$57,730
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$108,926
Exceptional
$103,824
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$115,957
Exceptional
$110,334
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$67,326
Exceptional
$67,472
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.9%
Good
25.4%

Latvian vs Korean Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Korean communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 18.0%), single father poverty (16.5% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 17.8%), and single male poverty (12.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (14.5% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 0.69%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and single mother poverty (26.9% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 1.8%).
Latvian vs Korean Poverty
Poverty MetricLatvianKorean
Poverty
Exceptional
10.5%
Exceptional
10.9%
Families
Exceptional
7.1%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Exceptional
9.6%
Exceptional
9.9%
Females
Exceptional
11.4%
Exceptional
11.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.5%
Exceptional
16.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.8%
Exceptional
12.0%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Exceptional
14.4%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.2%
Exceptional
13.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.4%
Exceptional
14.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.5%
Exceptional
14.1%
Single Males
Good
12.7%
Exceptional
11.0%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.0%
Exceptional
18.6%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Exceptional
14.0%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.9%
Exceptional
26.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.9%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.5%
Exceptional
10.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Exceptional
11.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.1%
Exceptional
10.4%

Latvian vs Korean Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Korean communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 15.4%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 14.0%), and unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.8%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.9%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.4%).
Latvian vs Korean Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLatvianKorean
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.7%
Fair
5.3%
Males
Exceptional
4.8%
Fair
5.3%
Females
Exceptional
4.7%
Poor
5.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.0%
Fair
11.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Good
17.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Average
10.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Fair
5.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Fair
4.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Good
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Good
4.8%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Excellent
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Fair
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Excellent
8.6%
Fair
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.8%
Excellent
7.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.9%
Good
5.4%

Latvian vs Korean Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Korean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 35.7%, a difference of 8.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.0% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.24%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 0.86%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 0.93%).
Latvian vs Korean Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLatvianKorean
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.5%
Exceptional
65.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.5%
Good
79.8%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.9%
Poor
35.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.1%
Good
75.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.1%
Tragic
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
86.0%
Fair
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.4%
Fair
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.8%
Good
82.9%

Latvian vs Korean Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Korean communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 19.0%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 13.9%), and family households with children (26.4% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.5% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.1%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 2.3%), and married-couple households (47.9% compared to 49.7%, a difference of 3.8%).
Latvian vs Korean Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLatvianKorean
Family Households
Tragic
62.8%
Exceptional
68.3%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.4%
Exceptional
29.2%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.9%
Exceptional
49.7%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.11
Exceptional
3.36
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Fair
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Excellent
6.0%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.5%
Exceptional
47.9%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.7%
Excellent
30.1%

Latvian vs Korean Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Korean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 41.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 24.8%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 61.0%, a difference of 8.4%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 22.5%).
Latvian vs Korean Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLatvianKorean
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.8%
Exceptional
8.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.3%
Exceptional
92.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
56.2%
Exceptional
61.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.3%
Exceptional
24.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.1%
Exceptional
8.6%

Latvian vs Korean Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Korean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 54.2%), professional degree (6.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 53.5%), and doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 50.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.87%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.88%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.89%).
Latvian vs Korean Education Level
Education Level MetricLatvianKorean
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Tragic
2.4%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.7%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.6%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.6%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.5%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.4%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.1%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
96.9%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
96.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Tragic
95.3%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Tragic
95.0%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Tragic
94.3%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.6%
Tragic
93.2%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.7%
Poor
92.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.6%
Fair
90.8%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
92.0%
Poor
88.6%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
89.2%
Average
85.6%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
71.6%
Good
65.9%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.1%
Average
59.7%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
53.9%
Fair
45.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
46.1%
Fair
37.0%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
19.8%
Poor
14.0%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.2%
Poor
4.1%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.6%
Poor
1.7%

Latvian vs Korean Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Korean communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 10.7%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 9.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.58%), disability (11.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.61%), and male disability (11.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.67%).
Latvian vs Korean Disability
Disability MetricLatvianKorean
Disability
Excellent
11.4%
Exceptional
11.3%
Males
Good
11.1%
Good
11.0%
Females
Exceptional
11.7%
Exceptional
11.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Excellent
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Poor
6.8%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.2%
Exceptional
10.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.2%
Good
23.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.1%
Tragic
48.6%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Fair
3.1%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.6%
Exceptional
16.8%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.7%
Exceptional
5.9%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Poor
2.5%