Latvian vs South African Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 120,899,623 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.594. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.257% in South Africans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 256.8 South Africans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and South African communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($120,301 compared to $113,229, a difference of 6.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($115,957 compared to $109,719, a difference of 5.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($108,926 compared to $103,160, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 0.54%), householder income over 65 years ($67,326 compared to $65,652, a difference of 2.5%), and householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $51,383, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and South African communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 17.2%), family poverty (7.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 16.2%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (13.5% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.92%), single father poverty (16.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and single mother poverty (26.9% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and South African communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 14.0%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 11.5%), and female unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.46%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.63%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.75%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and South African communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 5.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.36%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and South African communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 10.4%), births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 10.0%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.8% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 1.1%), married-couple households (47.9% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and currently married (48.5% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and South African communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 4.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.39%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 0.040%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 0.15%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and South African communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 14.0%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 10.1%), and professional degree (6.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.23%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.24%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and South African communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 17.2%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 7.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.23%), disability (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.35%), and disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 0.93%).