Latvian vs Immigrants from Zaire Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 79,671,640 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zaire within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.019. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.014% in Immigrants from Zaire. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 13.7 Immigrants from Zaire.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($108,926 compared to $78,045, a difference of 39.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($115,957 compared to $85,207, a difference of 36.1%), and per capita income ($52,649 compared to $38,848, a difference of 35.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $45,529, a difference of 15.9%), median female earnings ($43,941 compared to $36,017, a difference of 22.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($67,326 compared to $54,512, a difference of 23.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (13.2% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 52.6%), family poverty (7.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 51.6%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (13.4% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 50.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.5% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 5.0%), single male poverty (12.7% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 7.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 10.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 18.8%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 13.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.14%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 40.7%, a difference of 4.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.0% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 0.64%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.79%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.94%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 40.1%), births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 24.4%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.4% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 0.99%), average family size (3.11 compared to 3.22, a difference of 3.6%), and family households (62.8% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 20.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 15.4%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 9.3%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 14.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 47.3%), professional degree (6.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 40.2%), and master's degree (19.8% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 34.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.79%), 3rd grade (98.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.79%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 23.1%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 16.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.2%), male disability (11.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and disability (11.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 3.9%).