Latvian vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 132,605,945 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.687. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.026% in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 25.8 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($115,957 compared to $111,914, a difference of 3.6%), median family income ($120,301 compared to $116,165, a difference of 3.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $54,352, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($43,941 compared to $43,571, a difference of 0.85%), median earnings ($53,001 compared to $52,361, a difference of 1.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($67,326 compared to $66,376, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 17.5%), family poverty (7.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 8.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (19.0% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 0.29%), single father poverty (16.5% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and single mother poverty (26.9% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 7.9%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 7.6%), and female unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 6.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.47%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.68%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.77%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 2.4%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and average family size (3.11 compared to 3.14, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.9% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 0.22%), currently married (48.5% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.23%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 20.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 5.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 4.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 18.1%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 9.0%), and professional degree (6.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.29%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.30%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 9.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 8.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 0.010%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and female disability (11.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.3%).