Latvian vs Indian (Asian) Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,417,902 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.047. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.032% in Indians (Asian). To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to a decrease of 31.7 Indians (Asian).

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $58,239, a difference of 10.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($108,926 compared to $119,496, a difference of 9.7%), and median household income ($97,311 compared to $105,262, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($52,649 compared to $53,874, a difference of 2.3%), median male earnings ($63,498 compared to $66,078, a difference of 4.1%), and median family income ($120,301 compared to $125,312, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 23.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 17.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (13.2% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 0.21%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 0.65%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (13.4% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 11.4%), female unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 9.5%), and unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.80%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 22.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 71.9%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.57%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 13.8%), births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 9.7%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.5% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 1.1%), married-couple households (47.9% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 43.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 5.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 0.88%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 5.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 60.5%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 12.9%), and professional degree (6.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (66.1% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.040%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.91%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Indian (Asian) communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 30.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 23.2%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.2%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 3.1%).