Latvian vs Cuban Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 204,881,863 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Cubans within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.020. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.011% in Cubans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to a decrease of 11.0 Cubans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($120,301 compared to $84,981, a difference of 41.6%), per capita income ($52,649 compared to $37,383, a difference of 40.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($67,326 compared to $49,152, a difference of 37.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $50,655, a difference of 4.2%), wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 19.8%), and median female earnings ($43,941 compared to $34,942, a difference of 25.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 99.8%), married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 74.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 70.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.5% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.79%), single male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.84%), and single mother poverty (26.9% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 9.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 8.0%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.020%), unemployment (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.58%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 22.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 72.5%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.49%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.64%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 39.4%, a difference of 42.1%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 36.3%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.4% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 2.7%), average family size (3.11 compared to 3.25, a difference of 4.7%), and married-couple households (47.9% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 15.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 2.7%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 0.070%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 0.090%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 87.1%), master's degree (19.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 64.1%), and no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 63.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.97%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.0%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 21.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 19.8%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (11.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.47%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 1.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.1%).