Latvian vs Immigrants from Australia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 142,884,151 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Australia within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.614. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.179% in Immigrants from Australia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 1,179.0 Immigrants from Australia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,649 compared to $57,953, a difference of 10.1%), householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $56,660, a difference of 7.3%), and median male earnings ($63,498 compared to $67,634, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 1.2%), householder income over 65 years ($67,326 compared to $69,164, a difference of 2.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($115,957 compared to $119,308, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 13.2%), married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 12.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 0.40%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.86%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.5% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 0.97%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 6.6%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 0.24%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 35.1%, a difference of 10.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (86.0% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.55%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.59%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 4.2%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.8%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.11 compared to 3.13, a difference of 0.66%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and family households with children (26.4% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 41.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 52.4%, a difference of 7.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 4.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 5.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 13.5%), professional degree (6.2% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 10.6%), and doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.21%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.21%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.21%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 13.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 11.7%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 0.79%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.3%).