Latvian vs Subsaharan African Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,670,434 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.234. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.139% in Sub-Saharan Africans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to a decrease of 138.7 Sub-Saharan Africans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,649 compared to $40,152, a difference of 31.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($108,926 compared to $84,235, a difference of 29.3%), and median family income ($120,301 compared to $93,748, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $48,691, a difference of 8.4%), median female earnings ($43,941 compared to $38,391, a difference of 14.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($67,326 compared to $56,615, a difference of 18.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 54.5%), family poverty (7.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 53.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.2% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 51.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.5% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 2.9%), single male poverty (12.7% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 8.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 13.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 26.6%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 26.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 5.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.0% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 75.7%, a difference of 0.52%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 47.7%), births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 32.2%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.8% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 1.1%), family households with children (26.4% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 4.2%), and average family size (3.11 compared to 3.25, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 24.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 51.9%, a difference of 8.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 2.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 7.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 52.3%), no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 49.3%), and doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 46.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.81%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.82%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.82%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 24.3%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 18.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 0.35%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 3.3%), and male disability (11.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 6.0%).