Latvian vs Cypriot Community Comparison

COMPARE

Latvian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Cypriot
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Latvians

Cypriots

Exceptional
Excellent
9,576
SOCIAL INDEX
93.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
12th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,674
SOCIAL INDEX
84.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
58th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Cypriot Integration in Latvian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 52,539,856 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Cypriots within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.101. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.054% in Cypriots. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 53.9 Cypriots.
Latvian Integration in Cypriot Communities

Latvian vs Cypriot Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($108,926 compared to $116,364, a difference of 6.8%), householder income over 65 years ($67,326 compared to $71,714, a difference of 6.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($115,957 compared to $123,396, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $52,209, a difference of 1.1%), wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and median earnings ($53,001 compared to $54,589, a difference of 3.0%).
Latvian vs Cypriot Income
Income MetricLatvianCypriot
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$52,649
Exceptional
$54,899
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$120,301
Exceptional
$127,064
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$97,311
Exceptional
$102,843
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$53,001
Exceptional
$54,589
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$63,498
Exceptional
$65,549
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,941
Exceptional
$45,570
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Excellent
$52,783
Average
$52,209
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$108,926
Exceptional
$116,364
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$115,957
Exceptional
$123,396
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$67,326
Exceptional
$71,714
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.9%
Tragic
27.3%

Latvian vs Cypriot Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 11.0%), single male poverty (12.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 8.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 0.66%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.2% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 0.99%), and single female poverty (19.0% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 1.3%).
Latvian vs Cypriot Poverty
Poverty MetricLatvianCypriot
Poverty
Exceptional
10.5%
Exceptional
10.8%
Families
Exceptional
7.1%
Exceptional
7.3%
Males
Exceptional
9.6%
Exceptional
9.9%
Females
Exceptional
11.4%
Exceptional
11.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.5%
Exceptional
19.3%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.8%
Exceptional
11.5%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Exceptional
14.0%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.2%
Exceptional
13.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.4%
Exceptional
13.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.5%
Exceptional
13.2%
Single Males
Good
12.7%
Exceptional
11.7%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.0%
Exceptional
19.2%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Excellent
15.9%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.9%
Exceptional
28.3%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.9%
Exceptional
4.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.5%
Exceptional
10.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.1%
Exceptional
8.9%

Latvian vs Cypriot Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 17.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 15.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.8%).
Latvian vs Cypriot Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLatvianCypriot
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Exceptional
4.8%
Excellent
5.1%
Females
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.7%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.0%
Fair
11.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Tragic
19.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Poor
10.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Fair
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Good
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Good
4.8%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Excellent
8.6%
Exceptional
7.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.8%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.0%

Latvian vs Cypriot Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 15.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.41%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.20%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.0% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 0.29%).
Latvian vs Cypriot Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLatvianCypriot
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.5%
Excellent
65.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.5%
Exceptional
80.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.9%
Tragic
33.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.1%
Tragic
73.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.1%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
86.0%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.4%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.8%
Exceptional
84.1%

Latvian vs Cypriot Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 10.7%), single father households (2.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 8.9%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.9% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 0.23%), family households (62.8% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 0.69%), and average family size (3.11 compared to 3.14, a difference of 1.2%).
Latvian vs Cypriot Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLatvianCypriot
Family Households
Tragic
62.8%
Tragic
63.2%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.4%
Tragic
25.9%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.9%
Exceptional
48.0%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.11
Tragic
3.14
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
1.8%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.1%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.5%
Exceptional
47.8%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
10.5%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.7%
Exceptional
27.0%

Latvian vs Cypriot Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 60.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 21.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 7.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 50.6%, a difference of 11.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 16.0%).
Latvian vs Cypriot Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLatvianCypriot
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.8%
Tragic
15.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.3%
Tragic
84.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
56.2%
Tragic
50.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.3%
Tragic
16.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.1%
Tragic
5.0%

Latvian vs Cypriot Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 13.1%), professional degree (6.2% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 11.1%), and master's degree (19.8% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.24%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.25%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.25%).
Latvian vs Cypriot Education Level
Education Level MetricLatvianCypriot
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
97.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
95.8%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.6%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.7%
Exceptional
94.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.6%
Exceptional
93.1%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
92.0%
Exceptional
91.5%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
89.2%
Exceptional
88.9%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
71.6%
Exceptional
72.0%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.1%
Exceptional
67.0%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
53.9%
Exceptional
56.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
46.1%
Exceptional
49.0%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
19.8%
Exceptional
21.8%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.2%
Exceptional
6.9%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.6%
Exceptional
2.6%

Latvian vs Cypriot Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 13.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 13.2%), and male disability (11.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.86%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 1.8%).
Latvian vs Cypriot Disability
Disability MetricLatvianCypriot
Disability
Excellent
11.4%
Exceptional
10.6%
Males
Good
11.1%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Exceptional
11.7%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Poor
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Poor
6.8%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.2%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.2%
Exceptional
20.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.1%
Exceptional
43.5%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.6%
Excellent
17.1%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.7%
Exceptional
5.5%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.2%