Latvian vs Mexican Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 219,690,334 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Mexicans within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.023. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.036% in Mexicans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to a decrease of 36.1 Mexicans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,649 compared to $34,559, a difference of 52.3%), median family income ($120,301 compared to $85,618, a difference of 40.5%), and median male earnings ($63,498 compared to $46,147, a difference of 37.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $49,989, a difference of 5.6%), wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 7.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($67,326 compared to $53,897, a difference of 24.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 84.1%), family poverty (7.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 66.9%), and receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 60.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 1.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 5.1%), and single male poverty (12.7% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 31.1%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 30.9%), and female unemployment (4.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 30.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 6.5%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 6.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 9.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.0% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 77.2%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 50.7%), single father households (2.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 48.4%), and births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 33.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.9% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 1.6%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 5.1%), and currently married (48.5% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 46.0%), no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 39.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 28.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 93.0%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 61.7%, a difference of 9.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 28.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 127.1%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 120.0%), and no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 113.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.8%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 28.1%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 27.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 0.21%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 0.24%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 2.7%).