Latvian vs Inupiat Community Comparison
COMPARE
Latvian
Inupiat
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Latvians
Inupiat
9,576
SOCIAL INDEX
93.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
12th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,695
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
244th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Inupiat Integration in Latvian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 71,713,551 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Inupiat within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.090. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.013% in Inupiat. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to a decrease of 13.2 Inupiat.
Latvian vs Inupiat Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,649 compared to $36,999, a difference of 42.3%), median male earnings ($63,498 compared to $47,281, a difference of 34.3%), and wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 34.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $55,935, a difference of 6.0%), median female earnings ($43,941 compared to $40,080, a difference of 9.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($67,326 compared to $61,061, a difference of 10.3%).
Income Metric | Latvian | Inupiat |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $52,649 | Tragic $36,999 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $120,301 | Tragic $91,730 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $97,311 | Tragic $78,841 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $53,001 | Tragic $43,000 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $63,498 | Tragic $47,281 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $43,941 | Good $40,080 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Excellent $52,783 | Exceptional $55,935 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $108,926 | Tragic $84,619 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $115,957 | Tragic $91,355 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $67,326 | Average $61,061 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.9% | Exceptional 20.8% |
Latvian vs Inupiat Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 119.9%), married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 83.2%), and family poverty (7.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 76.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (26.9% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 8.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 15.9%), and single father poverty (16.5% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 18.3%).
Poverty Metric | Latvian | Inupiat |
Poverty | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 15.1% |
Families | Exceptional 7.1% | Tragic 12.5% |
Males | Exceptional 9.6% | Tragic 14.0% |
Females | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 16.2% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.5% | Tragic 22.6% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.8% | Tragic 18.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.5% | Tragic 22.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.2% | Tragic 19.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.4% | Tragic 18.1% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.5% | Tragic 20.8% |
Single Males | Good 12.7% | Tragic 20.0% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.0% | Tragic 23.1% |
Single Fathers | Fair 16.5% | Tragic 19.5% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.9% | Good 29.0% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 3.9% | Tragic 7.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.5% | Tragic 12.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.8% | Tragic 13.8% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.1% | Tragic 20.1% |
Latvian vs Inupiat Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 161.6%), male unemployment (4.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 149.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 117.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 6.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 18.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 45.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Latvian | Inupiat |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 10.1% |
Males | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 8.2% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.0% | Tragic 22.0% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Tragic 28.1% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 20.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 13.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 10.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 8.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 9.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Good 4.8% | Tragic 9.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 7.5% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors > 75 | Excellent 8.6% | Tragic 9.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.8% | Tragic 17.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 14.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 9.6% |
Latvian vs Inupiat Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 11.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 7.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.0% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 4.9%).
Labor Participation Metric | Latvian | Inupiat |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Excellent 65.5% | Tragic 64.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.5% | Tragic 76.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.9% | Tragic 35.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.1% | Poor 74.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 86.1% | Tragic 79.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 86.0% | Tragic 79.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.4% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.8% | Tragic 79.9% |
Latvian vs Inupiat Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 142.4%), births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 52.1%, a difference of 87.9%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 60.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.5%), family households (62.8% compared to 67.8%, a difference of 8.0%), and married-couple households (47.9% compared to 42.4%, a difference of 12.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Latvian | Inupiat |
Family Households | Tragic 62.8% | Exceptional 67.8% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.4% | Exceptional 32.8% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 47.9% | Tragic 42.4% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.11 | Exceptional 3.63 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 4.9% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 8.5% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.5% | Tragic 41.3% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 27.7% | Tragic 52.1% |
Latvian vs Inupiat Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 205.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 31.9%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 71.5%, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 14.4%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 71.5%, a difference of 26.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Latvian | Inupiat |
No Vehicles Available | Excellent 9.8% | Tragic 29.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 90.3% | Tragic 71.5% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 56.2% | Tragic 42.6% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.3% | Tragic 16.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Fair 6.1% | Fair 6.2% |
Latvian vs Inupiat Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 97.2%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 97.1%), and master's degree (19.8% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 88.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (97.0% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.030%), 6th grade (97.9% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.23%), and 7th grade (97.2% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.24%).
Education Level Metric | Latvian | Inupiat |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.9% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.9% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.9% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.8% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.8% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.6% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.4% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 98.1% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.2% | Exceptional 97.4% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.0% | Exceptional 97.0% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 95.8% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.6% | Exceptional 94.4% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.7% | Average 92.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.6% | Tragic 90.1% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 92.0% | Poor 88.5% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 89.2% | Tragic 83.1% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 71.6% | Tragic 54.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 66.1% | Tragic 47.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 53.9% | Tragic 32.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 46.1% | Tragic 25.8% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 19.8% | Tragic 10.5% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 3.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.6% | Tragic 1.3% |
Latvian vs Inupiat Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 182.8%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 62.7%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 47.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 1.4%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.5%).
Disability Metric | Latvian | Inupiat |
Disability | Excellent 11.4% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Good 11.1% | Tragic 13.0% |
Females | Exceptional 11.7% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.3% | Tragic 3.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Fair 5.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Poor 6.8% | Good 6.5% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 14.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.2% | Tragic 34.5% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.1% | Tragic 58.4% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.7% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 4.7% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.6% | Exceptional 16.9% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.7% | Exceptional 5.6% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Exceptional 2.2% |