Latvian vs Inupiat Community Comparison

COMPARE

Latvian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Inupiat
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Latvians

Inupiat

Exceptional
Fair
9,576
SOCIAL INDEX
93.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
12th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,695
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
244th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Inupiat Integration in Latvian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 71,713,551 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Inupiat within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.090. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.013% in Inupiat. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to a decrease of 13.2 Inupiat.
Latvian Integration in Inupiat Communities

Latvian vs Inupiat Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,649 compared to $36,999, a difference of 42.3%), median male earnings ($63,498 compared to $47,281, a difference of 34.3%), and wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 34.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $55,935, a difference of 6.0%), median female earnings ($43,941 compared to $40,080, a difference of 9.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($67,326 compared to $61,061, a difference of 10.3%).
Latvian vs Inupiat Income
Income MetricLatvianInupiat
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$52,649
Tragic
$36,999
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$120,301
Tragic
$91,730
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$97,311
Tragic
$78,841
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$53,001
Tragic
$43,000
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$63,498
Tragic
$47,281
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,941
Good
$40,080
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Excellent
$52,783
Exceptional
$55,935
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$108,926
Tragic
$84,619
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$115,957
Tragic
$91,355
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$67,326
Average
$61,061
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.9%
Exceptional
20.8%

Latvian vs Inupiat Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 119.9%), married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 83.2%), and family poverty (7.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 76.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (26.9% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 8.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 15.9%), and single father poverty (16.5% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 18.3%).
Latvian vs Inupiat Poverty
Poverty MetricLatvianInupiat
Poverty
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
15.1%
Families
Exceptional
7.1%
Tragic
12.5%
Males
Exceptional
9.6%
Tragic
14.0%
Females
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
16.2%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.5%
Tragic
22.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.8%
Tragic
18.5%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Tragic
22.0%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.2%
Tragic
19.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.4%
Tragic
18.1%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.5%
Tragic
20.8%
Single Males
Good
12.7%
Tragic
20.0%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.0%
Tragic
23.1%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Tragic
19.5%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.9%
Good
29.0%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.9%
Tragic
7.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
12.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
13.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
20.1%

Latvian vs Inupiat Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 161.6%), male unemployment (4.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 149.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 117.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 6.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 18.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 45.5%).
Latvian vs Inupiat Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLatvianInupiat
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
10.1%
Males
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
12.1%
Females
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
8.2%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
22.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Tragic
28.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Tragic
20.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
13.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
10.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
8.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
9.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Good
4.8%
Tragic
9.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
7.5%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 75
Excellent
8.6%
Tragic
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.8%
Tragic
17.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
14.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
9.6%

Latvian vs Inupiat Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 11.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 7.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.0% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 4.9%).
Latvian vs Inupiat Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLatvianInupiat
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.5%
Tragic
64.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.5%
Tragic
76.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.9%
Tragic
35.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.1%
Poor
74.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.1%
Tragic
79.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
86.0%
Tragic
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.4%
Tragic
80.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.8%
Tragic
79.9%

Latvian vs Inupiat Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 142.4%), births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 52.1%, a difference of 87.9%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 60.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.5%), family households (62.8% compared to 67.8%, a difference of 8.0%), and married-couple households (47.9% compared to 42.4%, a difference of 12.9%).
Latvian vs Inupiat Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLatvianInupiat
Family Households
Tragic
62.8%
Exceptional
67.8%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.4%
Exceptional
32.8%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.9%
Tragic
42.4%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.11
Exceptional
3.63
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
4.9%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
8.5%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.5%
Tragic
41.3%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.7%
Tragic
52.1%

Latvian vs Inupiat Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 205.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 31.9%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 71.5%, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 14.4%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 71.5%, a difference of 26.3%).
Latvian vs Inupiat Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLatvianInupiat
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.8%
Tragic
29.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.3%
Tragic
71.5%
2+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
56.2%
Tragic
42.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.3%
Tragic
16.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.1%
Fair
6.2%

Latvian vs Inupiat Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 97.2%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 97.1%), and master's degree (19.8% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 88.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (97.0% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.030%), 6th grade (97.9% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.23%), and 7th grade (97.2% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.24%).
Latvian vs Inupiat Education Level
Education Level MetricLatvianInupiat
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.9%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.8%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.8%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.6%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.4%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
98.1%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Exceptional
97.4%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Exceptional
97.0%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
95.8%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.6%
Exceptional
94.4%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.7%
Average
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.6%
Tragic
90.1%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
92.0%
Poor
88.5%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
89.2%
Tragic
83.1%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
71.6%
Tragic
54.6%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.1%
Tragic
47.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
53.9%
Tragic
32.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
46.1%
Tragic
25.8%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
19.8%
Tragic
10.5%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
3.2%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.6%
Tragic
1.3%

Latvian vs Inupiat Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 182.8%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 62.7%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 47.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 1.4%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.5%).
Latvian vs Inupiat Disability
Disability MetricLatvianInupiat
Disability
Excellent
11.4%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Good
11.1%
Tragic
13.0%
Females
Exceptional
11.7%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Tragic
3.7%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Fair
5.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Poor
6.8%
Good
6.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
14.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.2%
Tragic
34.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.1%
Tragic
58.4%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.7%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
4.7%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.6%
Exceptional
16.9%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.7%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.2%