Latvian vs Immigrants from Jamaica Community Comparison

COMPARE

Latvian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Jamaica
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Latvians

Immigrants from Jamaica

Exceptional
Tragic
9,576
SOCIAL INDEX
93.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
12th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,022
SOCIAL INDEX
7.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
326th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Jamaica Integration in Latvian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 158,560,379 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jamaica within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.093. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.041% in Immigrants from Jamaica. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 41.4 Immigrants from Jamaica.
Latvian Integration in Immigrants from Jamaica Communities

Latvian vs Immigrants from Jamaica Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 48.0%), per capita income ($52,649 compared to $38,766, a difference of 35.8%), and median family income ($120,301 compared to $89,268, a difference of 34.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $51,038, a difference of 3.4%), median female earnings ($43,941 compared to $38,625, a difference of 13.8%), and median earnings ($53,001 compared to $43,026, a difference of 23.2%).
Latvian vs Immigrants from Jamaica Income
Income MetricLatvianImmigrants from Jamaica
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$52,649
Tragic
$38,766
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$120,301
Tragic
$89,268
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$97,311
Tragic
$75,851
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$53,001
Tragic
$43,026
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$63,498
Tragic
$48,040
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,941
Tragic
$38,625
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Excellent
$52,783
Tragic
$51,038
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$108,926
Tragic
$83,298
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$115,957
Tragic
$87,035
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$67,326
Tragic
$54,027
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.9%
Exceptional
18.8%

Latvian vs Immigrants from Jamaica Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 85.1%), married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 59.5%), and family poverty (7.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 57.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.7% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 2.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 2.9%), and single father poverty (16.5% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 4.5%).
Latvian vs Immigrants from Jamaica Poverty
Poverty MetricLatvianImmigrants from Jamaica
Poverty
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
14.4%
Families
Exceptional
7.1%
Tragic
11.2%
Males
Exceptional
9.6%
Tragic
13.3%
Females
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
15.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.5%
Exceptional
18.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.8%
Tragic
14.7%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Tragic
20.5%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.2%
Tragic
19.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.4%
Tragic
20.1%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.5%
Tragic
19.8%
Single Males
Good
12.7%
Fair
13.0%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.0%
Fair
21.3%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Tragic
17.2%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.9%
Fair
29.6%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.9%
Tragic
6.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
13.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
15.3%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
16.9%

Latvian vs Immigrants from Jamaica Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (4.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 38.3%), unemployment (4.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 36.3%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.0% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 34.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 3.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 9.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 10.4%).
Latvian vs Immigrants from Jamaica Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLatvianImmigrants from Jamaica
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
6.4%
Males
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.7%
Females
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
6.2%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
14.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Tragic
22.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Tragic
13.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
8.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Good
4.8%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Excellent
8.6%
Fair
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.8%
Tragic
8.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
9.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.4%

Latvian vs Immigrants from Jamaica Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 32.2%, a difference of 20.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.97%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 1.9%).
Latvian vs Immigrants from Jamaica Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLatvianImmigrants from Jamaica
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.5%
Tragic
64.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.5%
Tragic
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.9%
Tragic
32.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.1%
Tragic
72.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.1%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
86.0%
Tragic
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.4%
Good
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.8%
Tragic
82.1%

Latvian vs Immigrants from Jamaica Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 58.2%), births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 38.8%, a difference of 39.9%), and currently married (48.5% compared to 41.1%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.4% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 1.3%), family households (62.8% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 3.1%), and average family size (3.11 compared to 3.33, a difference of 7.4%).
Latvian vs Immigrants from Jamaica Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLatvianImmigrants from Jamaica
Family Households
Tragic
62.8%
Excellent
64.7%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.4%
Tragic
26.8%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.9%
Tragic
40.7%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.11
Exceptional
3.33
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Average
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
8.4%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.5%
Tragic
41.1%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
13.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.7%
Tragic
38.8%

Latvian vs Immigrants from Jamaica Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 45.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 38.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 31.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 5.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 26.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 31.4%).
Latvian vs Immigrants from Jamaica Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLatvianImmigrants from Jamaica
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.8%
Tragic
14.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.3%
Tragic
85.8%
2+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
56.2%
Tragic
44.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.3%
Tragic
14.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.1%
Tragic
4.4%

Latvian vs Immigrants from Jamaica Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 88.5%), professional degree (6.2% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 75.0%), and no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 59.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.0%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.0%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.0%).
Latvian vs Immigrants from Jamaica Education Level
Education Level MetricLatvianImmigrants from Jamaica
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Tragic
2.5%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.5%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.5%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.4%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.3%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
96.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
96.4%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Tragic
95.4%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Tragic
94.9%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Tragic
93.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.6%
Tragic
92.6%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.7%
Tragic
91.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.6%
Tragic
89.5%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
92.0%
Tragic
86.9%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
89.2%
Tragic
82.9%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
71.6%
Tragic
59.7%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.1%
Tragic
54.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
53.9%
Tragic
41.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
46.1%
Tragic
32.9%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
19.8%
Tragic
13.0%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
3.6%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.6%
Tragic
1.4%

Latvian vs Immigrants from Jamaica Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 22.3%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 20.9%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (11.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 3.4%), disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 5.5%), and cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 5.6%).
Latvian vs Immigrants from Jamaica Disability
Disability MetricLatvianImmigrants from Jamaica
Disability
Excellent
11.4%
Tragic
12.1%
Males
Good
11.1%
Poor
11.5%
Females
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
12.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Average
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
6.1%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Poor
6.8%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.2%
Poor
11.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.2%
Fair
23.8%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.1%
Fair
47.6%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
2.6%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.6%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.7%
Tragic
6.8%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.7%