Latvian vs Navajo Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 126,259,474 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Navajo within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.534. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.468% in Navajo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 467.9 Navajo.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,649 compared to $29,031, a difference of 81.4%), median family income ($120,301 compared to $70,989, a difference of 69.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($115,957 compared to $69,759, a difference of 66.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $42,380, a difference of 24.5%), wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 24.6%), and median female earnings ($43,941 compared to $33,046, a difference of 33.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 204.0%), family poverty (7.1% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 165.7%), and male poverty (9.6% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 133.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (26.9% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 49.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 55.6%), and single female poverty (19.0% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 66.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 123.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 111.3%), and male unemployment (4.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 102.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 5.7%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 30.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 34.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 21.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 17.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.0% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 15.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 15.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 15.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 85.7%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 67.3%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 59.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.4% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 1.8%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 3.4%), and family households (62.8% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 34.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 15.6%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 0.50%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 117.3%), master's degree (19.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 110.1%), and bachelor's degree (46.1% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 95.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.54%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.55%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 58.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 57.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 52.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.82%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 12.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 18.4%).