Latvian vs Ottawa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 34,285,091 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Ottawa within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.229. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.174% in Ottawa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 174.0 Ottawa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Ottawa communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,649 compared to $37,101, a difference of 41.9%), median family income ($120,301 compared to $86,380, a difference of 39.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($115,957 compared to $83,953, a difference of 38.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 3.3%), householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $47,366, a difference of 11.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($67,326 compared to $53,217, a difference of 26.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Ottawa communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (13.4% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 46.0%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.2% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 45.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.8% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 44.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 5.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 10.4%), and single father poverty (16.5% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 12.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Ottawa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 45.9%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 33.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.090%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Ottawa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 10.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 62.0%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 0.98%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Ottawa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 32.7%), births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 36.5%, a difference of 31.5%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.11 compared to 3.11, a difference of 0.13%), family households (62.8% compared to 63.0%, a difference of 0.40%), and family households with children (26.4% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Ottawa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 32.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 8.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 2.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Ottawa communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.2% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 82.1%), master's degree (19.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 67.0%), and doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 62.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.060%), 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.060%), and 2nd grade (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Ottawa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 43.8%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 30.4%), and male disability (11.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 5.5%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 9.2%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 16.9%).