Latvian vs Cheyenne Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,911,193 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Cheyenne within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.890. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.064% in Cheyenne. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 1,063.6 Cheyenne.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($115,957 compared to $76,362, a difference of 51.8%), per capita income ($52,649 compared to $35,276, a difference of 49.2%), and median family income ($120,301 compared to $81,385, a difference of 47.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $45,275, a difference of 16.6%), wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 19.5%), and median female earnings ($43,941 compared to $35,673, a difference of 23.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 142.0%), family poverty (7.1% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 101.8%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.5% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 95.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.5% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.5%), single male poverty (12.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 27.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 37.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 148.6%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 102.8%), and male unemployment (4.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 102.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 9.9%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 12.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 13.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 77.6%, a difference of 8.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 7.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 73.4%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 62.0%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 53.0%), births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 49.1%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 45.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.8% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 0.64%), family households with children (26.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 3.4%), and average family size (3.11 compared to 3.47, a difference of 11.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 35.3%), no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 19.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 1.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 3.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 17.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (19.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 76.4%), professional degree (6.2% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 75.9%), and doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 62.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.13%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.13%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.14%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 55.9%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 46.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 34.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 6.8%), female disability (11.7% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 10.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 11.9%).