Latvian vs Yuman Community Comparison

COMPARE

Latvian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Yuman
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Latvians

Yuman

Exceptional
Tragic
9,576
SOCIAL INDEX
93.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
12th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
959
SOCIAL INDEX
7.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
331st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Yuman Integration in Latvian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 33,335,201 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Yuman within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.587. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.191% in Yuman. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 190.7 Yuman.
Latvian Integration in Yuman Communities

Latvian vs Yuman Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Yuman communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,649 compared to $33,236, a difference of 58.4%), median family income ($120,301 compared to $78,055, a difference of 54.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($108,926 compared to $72,956, a difference of 49.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $50,933, a difference of 3.6%), wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 19.4%), and median female earnings ($43,941 compared to $35,377, a difference of 24.2%).
Latvian vs Yuman Income
Income MetricLatvianYuman
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$52,649
Tragic
$33,236
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$120,301
Tragic
$78,055
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$97,311
Tragic
$68,743
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$53,001
Tragic
$39,523
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$63,498
Tragic
$45,446
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,941
Tragic
$35,377
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Excellent
$52,783
Tragic
$50,933
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$108,926
Tragic
$72,956
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$115,957
Tragic
$82,139
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$67,326
Tragic
$53,110
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.9%
Exceptional
23.3%

Latvian vs Yuman Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Yuman communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 149.7%), family poverty (7.1% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 135.1%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (13.4% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 129.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 23.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 38.3%), and single mother poverty (26.9% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 40.5%).
Latvian vs Yuman Poverty
Poverty MetricLatvianYuman
Poverty
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
20.2%
Families
Exceptional
7.1%
Tragic
16.6%
Males
Exceptional
9.6%
Tragic
19.5%
Females
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
20.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.5%
Tragic
24.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.8%
Tragic
22.9%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Tragic
29.5%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.2%
Tragic
28.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.4%
Tragic
30.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.5%
Tragic
27.1%
Single Males
Good
12.7%
Tragic
21.3%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.0%
Tragic
29.4%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Tragic
28.4%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.9%
Tragic
37.8%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.9%
Tragic
9.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
13.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
15.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
20.2%

Latvian vs Yuman Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Yuman communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 304.5%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 124.1%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 123.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 17.9%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 21.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 28.8%).
Latvian vs Yuman Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLatvianYuman
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
9.1%
Males
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
8.6%
Females
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
9.6%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
16.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Tragic
37.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Tragic
15.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
11.0%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
10.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
16.9%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
9.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
6.1%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Good
4.8%
Tragic
6.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 75
Excellent
8.6%
Exceptional
6.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.8%
Tragic
14.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
14.8%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
9.8%

Latvian vs Yuman Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Yuman communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 40.6%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 14.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 70.3%, a difference of 8.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 8.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 9.8%).
Latvian vs Yuman Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLatvianYuman
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.5%
Tragic
57.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.5%
Tragic
71.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.9%
Tragic
27.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.1%
Tragic
70.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.1%
Tragic
79.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
86.0%
Tragic
77.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.4%
Tragic
74.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.8%
Tragic
76.3%

Latvian vs Yuman Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Yuman communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 82.3%), single father households (2.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 64.3%), and births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 44.4%, a difference of 60.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 8.5%), family households (62.8% compared to 69.3%, a difference of 10.4%), and married-couple households (47.9% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 10.6%).
Latvian vs Yuman Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLatvianYuman
Family Households
Tragic
62.8%
Exceptional
69.3%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.4%
Exceptional
29.5%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.9%
Tragic
43.3%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.11
Exceptional
3.47
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
3.3%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
9.6%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.5%
Tragic
42.6%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
12.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.7%
Tragic
44.4%

Latvian vs Yuman Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Yuman communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 51.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 51.7%, a difference of 8.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 3.3%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 5.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 5.8%).
Latvian vs Yuman Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLatvianYuman
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.8%
Tragic
14.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.3%
Tragic
85.5%
2+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
56.2%
Tragic
51.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.3%
Good
19.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.1%
Good
6.5%

Latvian vs Yuman Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Yuman communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (19.8% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 114.6%), professional degree (6.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 90.8%), and bachelor's degree (46.1% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 87.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.63%), 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.65%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.66%).
Latvian vs Yuman Education Level
Education Level MetricLatvianYuman
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Tragic
2.5%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Fair
97.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Fair
97.9%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Fair
97.8%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Fair
97.8%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.6%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
96.7%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Tragic
95.2%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Tragic
94.9%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Tragic
93.8%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.6%
Tragic
92.0%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.7%
Tragic
89.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.6%
Tragic
86.5%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
92.0%
Tragic
84.0%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
89.2%
Tragic
79.2%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
71.6%
Tragic
55.1%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.1%
Tragic
48.7%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
53.9%
Tragic
31.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
46.1%
Tragic
24.5%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
19.8%
Tragic
9.2%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.6%
Tragic
1.5%

Latvian vs Yuman Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Yuman communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 55.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 54.4%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 50.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.58%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 5.5%), and cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 8.6%).
Latvian vs Yuman Disability
Disability MetricLatvianYuman
Disability
Excellent
11.4%
Tragic
14.6%
Males
Good
11.1%
Tragic
14.7%
Females
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
14.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Exceptional
0.95%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Poor
6.8%
Tragic
10.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
15.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.2%
Tragic
31.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.1%
Tragic
54.4%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
3.0%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
3.4%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.6%
Tragic
18.1%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.7%
Tragic
7.9%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.6%