Latvian vs Guamanian/Chamorro Community Comparison

COMPARE

Latvian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Guamanian/Chamorro
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Latvians

Guamanians/Chamorros

Exceptional
Fair
9,576
SOCIAL INDEX
93.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
12th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,082
SOCIAL INDEX
38.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
205th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Guamanian/Chamorro Integration in Latvian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 129,775,746 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Guamanians/Chamorros within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.605. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.202% in Guamanians/Chamorros. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 202.4 Guamanians/Chamorros.
Latvian Integration in Guamanian/Chamorro Communities

Latvian vs Guamanian/Chamorro Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,649 compared to $41,678, a difference of 26.3%), median family income ($120,301 compared to $101,061, a difference of 19.0%), and median male earnings ($63,498 compared to $53,661, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $53,423, a difference of 1.2%), householder income over 65 years ($67,326 compared to $63,187, a difference of 6.6%), and wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 7.3%).
Latvian vs Guamanian/Chamorro Income
Income MetricLatvianGuamanian/Chamorro
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$52,649
Tragic
$41,678
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$120,301
Fair
$101,061
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$97,311
Good
$86,255
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$53,001
Fair
$45,933
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$63,498
Fair
$53,661
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,941
Poor
$38,717
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Excellent
$52,783
Exceptional
$53,423
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$108,926
Fair
$93,569
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$115,957
Good
$101,170
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$67,326
Exceptional
$63,187
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.9%
Fair
26.0%

Latvian vs Guamanian/Chamorro Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 28.0%), married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 26.6%), and family poverty (7.1% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 2.4%), single male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 4.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 7.4%).
Latvian vs Guamanian/Chamorro Poverty
Poverty MetricLatvianGuamanian/Chamorro
Poverty
Exceptional
10.5%
Good
12.1%
Families
Exceptional
7.1%
Good
8.8%
Males
Exceptional
9.6%
Good
11.0%
Females
Exceptional
11.4%
Good
13.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.5%
Exceptional
19.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.8%
Average
13.6%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Excellent
16.5%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.2%
Good
15.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.4%
Good
16.1%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.5%
Good
15.9%
Single Males
Good
12.7%
Exceptional
12.2%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.0%
Poor
21.6%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Exceptional
15.1%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.9%
Fair
29.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.9%
Excellent
4.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.5%
Excellent
10.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Exceptional
11.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.1%
Average
11.7%

Latvian vs Guamanian/Chamorro Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 21.4%), female unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 19.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 4.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 4.5%).
Latvian vs Guamanian/Chamorro Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLatvianGuamanian/Chamorro
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.5%
Males
Exceptional
4.8%
Poor
5.4%
Females
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.6%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
11.9%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Poor
17.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Fair
10.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Fair
6.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
4.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Good
4.8%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Average
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Fair
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Excellent
8.6%
Tragic
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.8%
Fair
7.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Fair
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.8%

Latvian vs Guamanian/Chamorro Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (86.0% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 76.7%, a difference of 0.88%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 1.7%).
Latvian vs Guamanian/Chamorro Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLatvianGuamanian/Chamorro
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.5%
Exceptional
65.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.5%
Tragic
79.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.9%
Exceptional
38.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.1%
Exceptional
76.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.1%
Tragic
83.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
86.0%
Tragic
83.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.4%
Tragic
83.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.8%
Tragic
81.6%

Latvian vs Guamanian/Chamorro Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 28.6%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 25.8%), and births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.9% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 0.37%), currently married (48.5% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 2.9%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 5.8%).
Latvian vs Guamanian/Chamorro Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLatvianGuamanian/Chamorro
Family Households
Tragic
62.8%
Exceptional
66.6%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.4%
Exceptional
29.7%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.9%
Exceptional
48.1%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.11
Exceptional
3.29
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Poor
6.6%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.5%
Good
47.1%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.6%
Poor
12.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.7%
Average
31.6%

Latvian vs Guamanian/Chamorro Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 31.7%), no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 22.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 60.5%, a difference of 7.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 20.4%).
Latvian vs Guamanian/Chamorro Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLatvianGuamanian/Chamorro
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.8%
Exceptional
8.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.3%
Exceptional
92.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
56.2%
Exceptional
60.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.3%
Exceptional
23.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.1%
Exceptional
8.1%

Latvian vs Guamanian/Chamorro Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.2% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 64.3%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 59.9%), and master's degree (19.8% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 51.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.63%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.64%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.65%).
Latvian vs Guamanian/Chamorro Education Level
Education Level MetricLatvianGuamanian/Chamorro
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Fair
2.2%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Fair
97.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Fair
97.9%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Fair
97.8%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Fair
97.8%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Fair
97.7%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Fair
97.4%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Fair
97.2%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Fair
97.0%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Fair
95.9%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Fair
95.6%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Fair
94.8%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.6%
Fair
93.6%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.7%
Average
92.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.6%
Fair
91.0%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
92.0%
Fair
88.9%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
89.2%
Fair
85.3%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
71.6%
Average
65.4%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.1%
Fair
58.6%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
53.9%
Tragic
43.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
46.1%
Tragic
34.6%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
19.8%
Tragic
13.1%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
3.8%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.6%
Tragic
1.6%

Latvian vs Guamanian/Chamorro Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 20.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 19.1%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 1.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 4.7%), and female disability (11.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 6.1%).
Latvian vs Guamanian/Chamorro Disability
Disability MetricLatvianGuamanian/Chamorro
Disability
Excellent
11.4%
Tragic
12.3%
Males
Good
11.1%
Tragic
12.0%
Females
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Average
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Poor
6.8%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
12.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.2%
Tragic
25.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.1%
Tragic
49.4%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
3.3%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.6%
Tragic
17.9%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.7%
Poor
6.3%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.6%