Latvian vs Guamanian/Chamorro Community Comparison
COMPARE
Latvian
Guamanian/Chamorro
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Latvians
Guamanians/Chamorros
9,576
SOCIAL INDEX
93.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
12th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,082
SOCIAL INDEX
38.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
205th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Guamanian/Chamorro Integration in Latvian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 129,775,746 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Guamanians/Chamorros within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.605. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.202% in Guamanians/Chamorros. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 202.4 Guamanians/Chamorros.
Latvian vs Guamanian/Chamorro Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,649 compared to $41,678, a difference of 26.3%), median family income ($120,301 compared to $101,061, a difference of 19.0%), and median male earnings ($63,498 compared to $53,661, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $53,423, a difference of 1.2%), householder income over 65 years ($67,326 compared to $63,187, a difference of 6.6%), and wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 7.3%).
Income Metric | Latvian | Guamanian/Chamorro |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $52,649 | Tragic $41,678 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $120,301 | Fair $101,061 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $97,311 | Good $86,255 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $53,001 | Fair $45,933 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $63,498 | Fair $53,661 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $43,941 | Poor $38,717 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Excellent $52,783 | Exceptional $53,423 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $108,926 | Fair $93,569 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $115,957 | Good $101,170 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $67,326 | Exceptional $63,187 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.9% | Fair 26.0% |
Latvian vs Guamanian/Chamorro Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 28.0%), married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 26.6%), and family poverty (7.1% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 2.4%), single male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 4.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 7.4%).
Poverty Metric | Latvian | Guamanian/Chamorro |
Poverty | Exceptional 10.5% | Good 12.1% |
Families | Exceptional 7.1% | Good 8.8% |
Males | Exceptional 9.6% | Good 11.0% |
Females | Exceptional 11.4% | Good 13.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.5% | Exceptional 19.0% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.8% | Average 13.6% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.5% | Excellent 16.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.2% | Good 15.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.4% | Good 16.1% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.5% | Good 15.9% |
Single Males | Good 12.7% | Exceptional 12.2% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.0% | Poor 21.6% |
Single Fathers | Fair 16.5% | Exceptional 15.1% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.9% | Fair 29.4% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 3.9% | Excellent 4.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.5% | Excellent 10.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.8% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.1% | Average 11.7% |
Latvian vs Guamanian/Chamorro Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 21.4%), female unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 19.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 4.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 4.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Latvian | Guamanian/Chamorro |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.5% |
Males | Exceptional 4.8% | Poor 5.4% |
Females | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.6% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.0% | Tragic 11.9% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Poor 17.9% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Fair 10.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Fair 6.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 4.7% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Good 4.8% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Average 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Fair 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Excellent 8.6% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.8% | Fair 7.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Fair 9.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 5.8% |
Latvian vs Guamanian/Chamorro Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (86.0% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 76.7%, a difference of 0.88%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 1.7%).
Labor Participation Metric | Latvian | Guamanian/Chamorro |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Excellent 65.5% | Exceptional 65.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.5% | Tragic 79.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.9% | Exceptional 38.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.1% | Exceptional 76.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 86.1% | Tragic 83.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 86.0% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.4% | Tragic 83.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.8% | Tragic 81.6% |
Latvian vs Guamanian/Chamorro Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 28.6%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 25.8%), and births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.9% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 0.37%), currently married (48.5% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 2.9%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 5.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Latvian | Guamanian/Chamorro |
Family Households | Tragic 62.8% | Exceptional 66.6% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.4% | Exceptional 29.7% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 47.9% | Exceptional 48.1% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.11 | Exceptional 3.29 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.3% | Poor 6.6% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.5% | Good 47.1% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.6% | Poor 12.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 27.7% | Average 31.6% |
Latvian vs Guamanian/Chamorro Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 31.7%), no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 22.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 60.5%, a difference of 7.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 20.4%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Latvian | Guamanian/Chamorro |
No Vehicles Available | Excellent 9.8% | Exceptional 8.0% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 90.3% | Exceptional 92.1% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 56.2% | Exceptional 60.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.3% | Exceptional 23.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Fair 6.1% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Latvian vs Guamanian/Chamorro Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.2% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 64.3%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 59.9%), and master's degree (19.8% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 51.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.63%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.64%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.65%).
Education Level Metric | Latvian | Guamanian/Chamorro |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Fair 2.2% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Fair 97.9% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Fair 97.9% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Fair 97.8% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Fair 97.8% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Fair 97.7% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Fair 97.4% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Fair 97.2% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Fair 97.0% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.2% | Fair 95.9% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.0% | Fair 95.6% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Fair 94.8% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.6% | Fair 93.6% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.7% | Average 92.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.6% | Fair 91.0% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 92.0% | Fair 88.9% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 89.2% | Fair 85.3% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 71.6% | Average 65.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 66.1% | Fair 58.6% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 53.9% | Tragic 43.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 46.1% | Tragic 34.6% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 19.8% | Tragic 13.1% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 3.8% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.6% | Tragic 1.6% |
Latvian vs Guamanian/Chamorro Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 20.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 19.1%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 1.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 4.7%), and female disability (11.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 6.1%).
Disability Metric | Latvian | Guamanian/Chamorro |
Disability | Excellent 11.4% | Tragic 12.3% |
Males | Good 11.1% | Tragic 12.0% |
Females | Exceptional 11.7% | Tragic 12.5% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.3% | Average 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Poor 6.8% | Tragic 7.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 12.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.2% | Tragic 25.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.1% | Tragic 49.4% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 3.3% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.6% | Tragic 17.9% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.7% | Poor 6.3% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.6% |