Latvian vs Yugoslavian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Latvian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Yugoslavian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Latvians

Yugoslavians

Exceptional
Good
9,576
SOCIAL INDEX
93.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
12th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,775
SOCIAL INDEX
65.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
143rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Yugoslavian Integration in Latvian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 163,691,407 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.763. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.689% in Yugoslavians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 689.0 Yugoslavians.
Latvian Integration in Yugoslavian Communities

Latvian vs Yugoslavian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,649 compared to $42,792, a difference of 23.0%), median family income ($120,301 compared to $100,119, a difference of 20.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($108,926 compared to $91,368, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $51,028, a difference of 3.4%), wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 4.4%), and median female earnings ($43,941 compared to $38,573, a difference of 13.9%).
Latvian vs Yugoslavian Income
Income MetricLatvianYugoslavian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$52,649
Fair
$42,792
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$120,301
Fair
$100,119
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$97,311
Poor
$82,186
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$53,001
Fair
$45,846
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$63,498
Fair
$53,967
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,941
Tragic
$38,573
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Excellent
$52,783
Tragic
$51,028
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$108,926
Poor
$91,368
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$115,957
Fair
$97,558
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$67,326
Tragic
$58,243
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.9%
Tragic
26.7%

Latvian vs Yugoslavian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.1% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 20.5%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.2% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 20.3%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (13.5% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.39%), single father poverty (16.5% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 1.5%).
Latvian vs Yugoslavian Poverty
Poverty MetricLatvianYugoslavian
Poverty
Exceptional
10.5%
Excellent
11.8%
Families
Exceptional
7.1%
Excellent
8.5%
Males
Exceptional
9.6%
Good
10.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.4%
Good
13.1%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.5%
Good
19.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.8%
Average
13.6%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Average
17.2%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.2%
Good
15.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.4%
Good
15.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.5%
Good
16.2%
Single Males
Good
12.7%
Good
12.6%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.0%
Fair
21.2%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Average
16.3%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.9%
Fair
29.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.9%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.5%
Exceptional
10.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Exceptional
11.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.1%
Exceptional
10.7%

Latvian vs Yugoslavian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 13.8%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 8.0%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.96%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 1.2%).
Latvian vs Yugoslavian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLatvianYugoslavian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.8%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.0%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Exceptional
15.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Exceptional
9.6%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Good
4.8%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Excellent
8.6%
Tragic
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.8%
Fair
7.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
8.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.1%

Latvian vs Yugoslavian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 7.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 0.19%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.57%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.58%).
Latvian vs Yugoslavian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLatvianYugoslavian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.5%
Excellent
65.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.5%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.9%
Exceptional
41.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.1%
Exceptional
78.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.1%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
86.0%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.4%
Exceptional
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.8%
Good
83.0%

Latvian vs Yugoslavian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 17.1%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 16.2%), and births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.8% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 0.52%), average family size (3.11 compared to 3.15, a difference of 1.3%), and family households with children (26.4% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 2.1%).
Latvian vs Yugoslavian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLatvianYugoslavian
Family Households
Tragic
62.8%
Tragic
63.1%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.4%
Tragic
27.0%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.9%
Fair
46.2%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.11
Tragic
3.15
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Average
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Good
6.1%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.5%
Good
47.2%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
12.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.7%
Good
30.8%

Latvian vs Yugoslavian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 9.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 2.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 0.56%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 0.85%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 2.1%).
Latvian vs Yugoslavian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLatvianYugoslavian
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.8%
Exceptional
9.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.3%
Exceptional
91.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
56.2%
Exceptional
56.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.3%
Good
19.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.1%
Average
6.3%

Latvian vs Yugoslavian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 52.0%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 48.7%), and master's degree (19.8% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 37.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.29%), 3rd grade (98.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.30%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.32%).
Latvian vs Yugoslavian Education Level
Education Level MetricLatvianYugoslavian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
97.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
95.7%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.6%
Exceptional
94.6%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.7%
Exceptional
93.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.6%
Exceptional
92.1%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
92.0%
Exceptional
90.2%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
89.2%
Excellent
86.7%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
71.6%
Average
65.6%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.1%
Average
59.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
53.9%
Average
46.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
46.1%
Fair
37.1%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
19.8%
Fair
14.4%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.2%
Poor
4.1%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.6%
Poor
1.7%

Latvian vs Yugoslavian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 15.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 9.9%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 3.2%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 3.6%), and disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 3.7%).
Latvian vs Yugoslavian Disability
Disability MetricLatvianYugoslavian
Disability
Excellent
11.4%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Good
11.1%
Tragic
11.9%
Females
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
12.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Tragic
1.4%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Poor
6.8%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.2%
Poor
11.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.2%
Average
23.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.1%
Excellent
46.8%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Average
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
3.3%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.6%
Good
17.2%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.7%
Poor
6.3%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Fair
2.5%