Latvian vs Malaysian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 132,297,527 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Malaysians within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.077. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.018% in Malaysians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 18.5 Malaysians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,649 compared to $39,194, a difference of 34.3%), median family income ($120,301 compared to $95,230, a difference of 26.3%), and median male earnings ($63,498 compared to $50,772, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $51,615, a difference of 2.3%), wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 11.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($67,326 compared to $58,244, a difference of 15.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 39.4%), married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 37.2%), and family poverty (7.1% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 36.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.45%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 14.5%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 13.3%), and female unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.36%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.61%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (86.0% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 2.3%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 39.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.91%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 77.2%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 38.3%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 36.1%), and births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.9% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 3.4%), family households (62.8% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 5.0%), and currently married (48.5% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 27.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 25.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 6.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 17.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.2% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 84.0%), no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 79.4%), and doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 77.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 22.7%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 19.7%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 0.62%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 4.8%).