Latvian vs Marshallese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 10,779,154 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Marshallese within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.942. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.655% in Marshallese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 1,655.1 Marshallese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,649 compared to $39,108, a difference of 34.6%), median male earnings ($63,498 compared to $48,137, a difference of 31.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($108,926 compared to $83,575, a difference of 30.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($67,326 compared to $65,874, a difference of 2.2%), householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $50,627, a difference of 4.3%), and wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 19.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 54.5%), family poverty (7.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 40.5%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (13.5% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 38.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.84%), single father poverty (16.5% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 2.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 45.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 41.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 41.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 2.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 3.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (86.0% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 8.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 39.5%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 25.4%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 21.3%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.4% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 0.75%), family households (62.8% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 33.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 10.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 54.9%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.090%), no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 0.31%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 54.9%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 76.6%), master's degree (19.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 71.3%), and professional degree (6.2% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 66.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.44%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.44%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 0.94%, a difference of 40.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 23.2%), and ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 3.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 5.0%), and cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 6.5%).