Latvian vs Menominee Community Comparison
COMPARE
Latvian
Menominee
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Latvians
Menominee
9,576
SOCIAL INDEX
93.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
12th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,175
SOCIAL INDEX
29.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
229th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Menominee Integration in Latvian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 37,714,264 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Menominee within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.413. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.101% in Menominee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to a decrease of 101.3 Menominee.
Latvian vs Menominee Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,649 compared to $34,578, a difference of 52.3%), median family income ($120,301 compared to $79,563, a difference of 51.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($115,957 compared to $76,903, a difference of 50.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $47,907, a difference of 10.2%), wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 22.7%), and median female earnings ($43,941 compared to $33,894, a difference of 29.6%).
Income Metric | Latvian | Menominee |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $52,649 | Tragic $34,578 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $120,301 | Tragic $79,563 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $97,311 | Tragic $68,423 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $53,001 | Tragic $37,884 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $63,498 | Tragic $42,581 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $43,941 | Tragic $33,894 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Excellent $52,783 | Tragic $47,907 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $108,926 | Tragic $79,358 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $115,957 | Tragic $76,903 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $67,326 | Tragic $51,719 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.9% | Exceptional 22.7% |
Latvian vs Menominee Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 88.6%), child poverty among girls under 16 (13.5% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 85.0%), and family poverty (7.1% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 79.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 1.0%), single father poverty (16.5% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 2.2%).
Poverty Metric | Latvian | Menominee |
Poverty | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 16.4% |
Families | Exceptional 7.1% | Tragic 12.7% |
Males | Exceptional 9.6% | Tragic 15.3% |
Females | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 17.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.5% | Tragic 22.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.8% | Tragic 18.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.5% | Tragic 23.3% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.2% | Tragic 23.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.4% | Tragic 21.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.5% | Tragic 25.0% |
Single Males | Good 12.7% | Tragic 17.7% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.0% | Tragic 27.8% |
Single Fathers | Fair 16.5% | Tragic 16.8% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.9% | Tragic 37.1% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 3.9% | Average 5.2% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.5% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.8% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.1% | Tragic 17.2% |
Latvian vs Menominee Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 127.5%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 82.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 56.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.91%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 2.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Latvian | Menominee |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 6.4% |
Males | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 6.0% |
Females | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 7.0% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.0% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Exceptional 16.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 11.3% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 6.5% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 10.5% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Good 4.8% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.8% | Tragic 8.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Fair 9.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Poor 5.6% |
Latvian vs Menominee Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 14.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 68.7%, a difference of 10.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.82%), in labor force | age 30-34 (86.0% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 6.9%).
Labor Participation Metric | Latvian | Menominee |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Excellent 65.5% | Tragic 60.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.5% | Tragic 75.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.9% | Tragic 33.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.1% | Tragic 68.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 86.1% | Exceptional 85.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 86.0% | Tragic 82.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.4% | Tragic 79.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.8% | Tragic 77.4% |
Latvian vs Menominee Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 110.2%), births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 51.1%, a difference of 84.4%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 73.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.5%), family households with children (26.4% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 4.5%), and family households (62.8% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 6.0%).
Family Structure Metric | Latvian | Menominee |
Family Households | Tragic 62.8% | Exceptional 66.5% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.4% | Good 27.6% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 47.9% | Tragic 42.0% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.11 | Exceptional 3.30 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 4.2% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 9.2% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.5% | Tragic 42.3% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 11.8% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 27.7% | Tragic 51.1% |
Latvian vs Menominee Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 23.0%), no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 20.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 1.8%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 2.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 12.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Latvian | Menominee |
No Vehicles Available | Excellent 9.8% | Tragic 11.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 90.3% | Tragic 88.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 56.2% | Average 55.3% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.3% | Tragic 17.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Fair 6.1% | Tragic 5.0% |
Latvian vs Menominee Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 101.4%), master's degree (19.8% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 94.4%), and doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 90.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.35%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.35%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.35%).
Education Level Metric | Latvian | Menominee |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Excellent 1.9% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.1% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 97.8% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.5% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.2% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.0% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 95.6% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.6% | Exceptional 94.6% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.7% | Exceptional 93.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.6% | Exceptional 91.9% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 92.0% | Exceptional 90.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 89.2% | Good 86.3% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 71.6% | Tragic 57.0% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 66.1% | Tragic 50.6% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 53.9% | Tragic 36.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 46.1% | Tragic 27.3% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 19.8% | Tragic 10.2% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 3.1% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.6% | Tragic 1.4% |
Latvian vs Menominee Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 75.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 56.2%), and ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 35.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.8%), female disability (11.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 7.7%), and cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 8.0%).
Disability Metric | Latvian | Menominee |
Disability | Excellent 11.4% | Tragic 13.8% |
Males | Good 11.1% | Tragic 15.0% |
Females | Exceptional 11.7% | Tragic 12.6% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.3% | Tragic 2.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Poor 6.8% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 15.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.2% | Tragic 27.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.1% | Tragic 52.3% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.5% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.6% | Tragic 18.0% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.7% | Tragic 7.8% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.8% |