Latvian vs Taiwanese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Latvian
Taiwanese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Latvians
Taiwanese
9,576
SOCIAL INDEX
93.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
12th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,532
SOCIAL INDEX
62.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
151st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Taiwanese Integration in Latvian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 28,759,924 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Taiwanese within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.047. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.024% in Taiwanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 24.3 Taiwanese.
Latvian vs Taiwanese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($63,498 compared to $55,556, a difference of 14.3%), per capita income ($52,649 compared to $46,455, a difference of 13.3%), and median family income ($120,301 compared to $107,295, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $49,804, a difference of 6.0%), householder income over 65 years ($67,326 compared to $62,894, a difference of 7.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($108,926 compared to $101,492, a difference of 7.3%).
Income Metric | Latvian | Taiwanese |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $52,649 | Exceptional $46,455 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $120,301 | Exceptional $107,295 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $97,311 | Exceptional $89,900 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $53,001 | Excellent $47,902 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $63,498 | Good $55,556 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $43,941 | Excellent $40,576 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Excellent $52,783 | Tragic $49,804 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $108,926 | Exceptional $101,492 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $115,957 | Excellent $104,180 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $67,326 | Excellent $62,894 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.9% | Excellent 25.1% |
Latvian vs Taiwanese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 22.5%), receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 21.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (14.5% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 0.11%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.32%), and single female poverty (19.0% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 2.3%).
Poverty Metric | Latvian | Taiwanese |
Poverty | Exceptional 10.5% | Good 12.2% |
Families | Exceptional 7.1% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Males | Exceptional 9.6% | Good 11.0% |
Females | Exceptional 11.4% | Good 13.1% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.5% | Tragic 21.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.8% | Exceptional 11.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.5% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.2% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.4% | Exceptional 14.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.5% | Exceptional 14.6% |
Single Males | Good 12.7% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.0% | Exceptional 19.4% |
Single Fathers | Fair 16.5% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.9% | Exceptional 27.5% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 3.9% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.5% | Fair 11.2% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.8% | Poor 12.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.1% | Excellent 11.0% |
Latvian vs Taiwanese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 33.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 30.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.58%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Latvian | Taiwanese |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.7% | Average 5.3% |
Males | Exceptional 4.8% | Fair 5.3% |
Females | Exceptional 4.7% | Average 5.3% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.0% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Exceptional 15.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Good 5.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Good 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Good 4.8% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 6.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 6.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Excellent 8.6% | Exceptional 6.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.8% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Latvian vs Taiwanese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 14.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.0% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.30%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.35%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.44%).
Labor Participation Metric | Latvian | Taiwanese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Excellent 65.5% | Exceptional 66.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.5% | Exceptional 80.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.9% | Tragic 33.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.1% | Fair 74.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 86.1% | Exceptional 85.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 86.0% | Fair 84.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.4% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.8% | Exceptional 83.4% |
Latvian vs Taiwanese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 9.6%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 9.0%), and currently married (48.5% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.8% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 0.92%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and family households with children (26.4% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 1.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Latvian | Taiwanese |
Family Households | Tragic 62.8% | Tragic 63.3% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.4% | Tragic 26.7% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 47.9% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.11 | Average 3.23 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.3% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.5% | Poor 45.8% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 27.7% | Exceptional 29.0% |
Latvian vs Taiwanese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 19.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 14.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 2.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 3.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 4.4%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Latvian | Taiwanese |
No Vehicles Available | Excellent 9.8% | Tragic 11.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 90.3% | Tragic 88.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 56.2% | Tragic 53.9% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.3% | Excellent 20.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Fair 6.1% | Exceptional 7.0% |
Latvian vs Taiwanese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 61.6%), professional degree (6.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 25.4%), and doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.98%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.98%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.0%).
Education Level Metric | Latvian | Taiwanese |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Tragic 2.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.4% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.3% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 96.7% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 96.5% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.2% | Tragic 94.8% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.0% | Tragic 94.7% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Tragic 93.6% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.6% | Tragic 92.5% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.7% | Tragic 91.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.6% | Tragic 90.0% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 92.0% | Tragic 87.9% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 89.2% | Tragic 84.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 71.6% | Good 66.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 66.1% | Excellent 60.7% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 53.9% | Excellent 47.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 46.1% | Exceptional 40.0% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 19.8% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.6% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Latvian vs Taiwanese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 14.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 14.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 0.37%), ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.8%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 2.9%).
Disability Metric | Latvian | Taiwanese |
Disability | Excellent 11.4% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Males | Good 11.1% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Females | Exceptional 11.7% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.3% | Tragic 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Poor 6.8% | Exceptional 6.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.2% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.2% | Excellent 22.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.1% | Tragic 48.2% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Exceptional 2.8% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.6% | Tragic 17.6% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.7% | Exceptional 5.6% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Exceptional 2.4% |