Latvian vs Immigrants from Kenya Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,855,408 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Kenya within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.350. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.152% in Immigrants from Kenya. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 152.0 Immigrants from Kenya.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Kenya communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,649 compared to $42,661, a difference of 23.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($108,926 compared to $90,767, a difference of 20.0%), and median family income ($120,301 compared to $100,679, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $49,633, a difference of 6.4%), median female earnings ($43,941 compared to $39,535, a difference of 11.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($67,326 compared to $59,710, a difference of 12.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Kenya communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 30.0%), receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 29.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.2% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 1.6%), single mother poverty (26.9% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 7.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Kenya communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 9.9%), unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 8.1%), and female unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.55%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.93%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.99%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Kenya communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 4.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 67.6%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 0.28%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.29%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Kenya communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 32.0%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 19.5%), and births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.8% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 0.67%), average family size (3.11 compared to 3.21, a difference of 3.3%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Kenya communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 2.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 2.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.080%), no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Kenya communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 42.6%), no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 38.2%), and doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 34.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.64%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.64%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Kenya communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 14.2%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 12.2%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (11.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.27%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 0.86%), and ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.1%).