Latvian vs Celtic Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,714,459 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.940. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.204% in Celtics. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 204.5 Celtics.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,649 compared to $43,621, a difference of 20.7%), median family income ($120,301 compared to $101,139, a difference of 19.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($108,926 compared to $92,241, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 2.2%), householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $50,447, a difference of 4.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($67,326 compared to $60,608, a difference of 11.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (13.5% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 25.5%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.2% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 24.8%), and family poverty (7.1% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 1.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 3.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 10.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 22.6%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 11.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.63%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.0% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 6.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 20.1%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 16.1%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.11 compared to 3.11, a difference of 0.22%), family households with children (26.4% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 0.68%), and married-couple households (47.9% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 21.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 15.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 5.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 12.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 42.2%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 36.6%), and master's degree (19.8% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 34.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.070%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.070%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 27.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 26.4%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 3.1%), disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 4.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 11.3%).