Latvian vs Hungarian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,018,623 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Hungarians within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.220. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.109% in Hungarians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 108.7 Hungarians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,649 compared to $45,426, a difference of 15.9%), median family income ($120,301 compared to $105,609, a difference of 13.9%), and median household income ($97,311 compared to $86,920, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 4.1%), householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $50,247, a difference of 5.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($67,326 compared to $61,673, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 36.3%), family poverty (7.1% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 24.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.5% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 1.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 2.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 17.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 15.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.0% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 0.27%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 12.7%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 8.3%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.5% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 0.74%), average family size (3.11 compared to 3.18, a difference of 2.3%), and married-couple households (47.9% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 4.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 2.8%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.010%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 0.46%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 35.5%), professional degree (6.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 34.7%), and master's degree (19.8% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (97.0% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.020%), 7th grade (97.2% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.030%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.040%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 18.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 12.2%), and ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 1.0%), disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 3.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 4.5%).