Latvian vs Immigrants from Egypt Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 149,225,920 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Egypt within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.348. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.327% in Immigrants from Egypt. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 326.5 Immigrants from Egypt.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Egypt communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,649 compared to $47,361, a difference of 11.2%), median family income ($120,301 compared to $111,689, a difference of 7.7%), and wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($43,941 compared to $42,837, a difference of 2.6%), householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $54,239, a difference of 2.8%), and median household income ($97,311 compared to $93,700, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Egypt communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 27.6%), family poverty (7.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 17.3%), and single father poverty (16.5% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (26.9% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 0.96%), single female poverty (19.0% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Egypt communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 10.9%), unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 10.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 0.80%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Egypt communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 12.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.50%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.50%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.77%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Egypt communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 13.8%), family households with children (26.4% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 7.9%), and average family size (3.11 compared to 3.24, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.9% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 0.030%), currently married (48.5% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Egypt communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 25.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 53.8%, a difference of 4.6%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 87.8%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 2.5%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 87.8%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Egypt communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 38.2%), professional degree (6.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 23.0%), and doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.65%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.66%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Egypt communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 19.7%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 18.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.59%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 2.0%).