Latvian vs Liberian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Latvian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Liberian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Latvians

Liberians

Exceptional
Poor
9,576
SOCIAL INDEX
93.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
12th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,824
SOCIAL INDEX
15.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
286th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Liberian Integration in Latvian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 83,997,335 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Liberians within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.606. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.636% in Liberians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 635.9 Liberians.
Latvian Integration in Liberian Communities

Latvian vs Liberian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Liberian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,649 compared to $38,780, a difference of 35.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($108,926 compared to $82,005, a difference of 32.8%), and median family income ($120,301 compared to $91,722, a difference of 31.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $48,917, a difference of 7.9%), median female earnings ($43,941 compared to $38,215, a difference of 15.0%), and median earnings ($53,001 compared to $43,536, a difference of 21.7%).
Latvian vs Liberian Income
Income MetricLatvianLiberian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$52,649
Tragic
$38,780
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$120,301
Tragic
$91,722
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$97,311
Tragic
$75,667
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$53,001
Tragic
$43,536
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$63,498
Tragic
$49,318
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,941
Tragic
$38,215
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Excellent
$52,783
Tragic
$48,917
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$108,926
Tragic
$82,005
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$115,957
Tragic
$88,929
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$67,326
Tragic
$54,356
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.9%
Exceptional
21.4%

Latvian vs Liberian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Liberian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 62.3%), family poverty (7.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 49.8%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.2% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 47.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.7% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 2.5%), single father poverty (16.5% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 2.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 5.8%).
Latvian vs Liberian Poverty
Poverty MetricLatvianLiberian
Poverty
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
14.1%
Families
Exceptional
7.1%
Tragic
10.6%
Males
Exceptional
9.6%
Tragic
12.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
15.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.5%
Poor
20.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.8%
Tragic
15.3%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Tragic
20.2%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.2%
Tragic
19.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.4%
Tragic
19.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.5%
Tragic
19.9%
Single Males
Good
12.7%
Fair
13.0%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.0%
Tragic
22.4%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Excellent
16.0%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.9%
Poor
29.9%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.9%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
11.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Fair
12.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
14.8%

Latvian vs Liberian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Liberian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 26.1%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 23.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 5.9%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 7.0%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 8.2%).
Latvian vs Liberian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLatvianLiberian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.6%
Males
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.8%
Females
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.5%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
12.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Poor
17.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Tragic
10.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Poor
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Good
4.8%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Excellent
8.6%
Tragic
10.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.8%
Tragic
8.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
10.8%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.0%

Latvian vs Liberian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Liberian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 7.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 67.8%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 0.34%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.0% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 0.40%).
Latvian vs Liberian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLatvianLiberian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.5%
Exceptional
67.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.5%
Exceptional
80.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.9%
Exceptional
41.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.1%
Exceptional
78.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.1%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
86.0%
Exceptional
86.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.4%
Exceptional
85.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.8%
Excellent
83.0%

Latvian vs Liberian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Liberian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 63.5%), births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 34.8%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.8% compared to 62.0%, a difference of 1.3%), average family size (3.11 compared to 3.25, a difference of 4.6%), and family households with children (26.4% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 6.9%).
Latvian vs Liberian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLatvianLiberian
Family Households
Tragic
62.8%
Tragic
62.0%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.4%
Exceptional
28.3%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.9%
Tragic
40.7%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.11
Excellent
3.25
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.5%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
8.6%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.5%
Tragic
42.2%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
12.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.7%
Tragic
37.4%

Latvian vs Liberian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Liberian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 22.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 16.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 88.0%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 51.7%, a difference of 8.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 13.4%).
Latvian vs Liberian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLatvianLiberian
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.8%
Tragic
12.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.3%
Tragic
88.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
56.2%
Tragic
51.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.3%
Tragic
17.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.1%
Tragic
5.3%

Latvian vs Liberian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Liberian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.2% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 75.9%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 69.5%), and master's degree (19.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 54.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.89%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.90%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.90%).
Latvian vs Liberian Education Level
Education Level MetricLatvianLiberian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Tragic
2.4%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.7%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.6%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.6%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.6%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.4%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
96.8%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Fair
95.9%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Fair
95.6%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Fair
94.8%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.6%
Fair
93.6%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.7%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.6%
Poor
90.8%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
92.0%
Poor
88.7%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
89.2%
Poor
85.0%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
71.6%
Tragic
63.0%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.1%
Tragic
56.7%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
53.9%
Tragic
43.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
46.1%
Tragic
34.6%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
19.8%
Tragic
12.8%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
3.6%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.6%
Tragic
1.5%

Latvian vs Liberian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Liberian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 27.2%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 20.7%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 3.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 3.6%), and male disability (11.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 5.9%).
Latvian vs Liberian Disability
Disability MetricLatvianLiberian
Disability
Excellent
11.4%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Good
11.1%
Tragic
11.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
12.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Fair
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Poor
6.8%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
12.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.2%
Tragic
25.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.1%
Tragic
48.0%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Excellent
2.8%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.6%
Tragic
18.6%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.7%
Tragic
6.3%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.6%