Latvian vs Samoan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 127,980,550 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Samoans within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.648. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.130% in Samoans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 129.8 Samoans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,649 compared to $39,826, a difference of 32.2%), median male earnings ($63,498 compared to $51,389, a difference of 23.6%), and median earnings ($53,001 compared to $44,206, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($67,326 compared to $65,427, a difference of 2.9%), householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $54,610, a difference of 3.5%), and wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 32.3%), married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 25.2%), and family poverty (7.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 2.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 5.7%), and single mother poverty (26.9% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 20.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 17.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 3.4%), in labor force | age 30-34 (86.0% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 0.66%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 30.8%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 23.7%), and births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.9% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 1.6%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 3.4%), and currently married (48.5% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 50.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 29.5%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 9.3%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 28.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 87.8%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 81.2%), and master's degree (19.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 72.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.76%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.76%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.77%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 19.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 18.7%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 3.5%).