Latvian vs Immigrants from Fiji Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,537,423 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Fiji within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.319. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.298% in Immigrants from Fiji. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 297.9 Immigrants from Fiji.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 24.4%), per capita income ($52,649 compared to $42,694, a difference of 23.3%), and median male earnings ($63,498 compared to $54,958, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($97,311 compared to $93,933, a difference of 3.6%), householder income over 65 years ($67,326 compared to $64,795, a difference of 3.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($108,926 compared to $103,954, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 44.1%), receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 33.0%), and family poverty (7.1% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (19.0% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 0.72%), single mother poverty (26.9% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 1.0%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.5% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 25.7%), unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 25.4%), and male unemployment (4.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.3%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 3.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 14.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (86.0% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.79%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 78.6%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 35.5%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 26.0%), and family households with children (26.4% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.15%), married-couple households (47.9% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 0.74%), and currently married (48.5% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 57.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 35.1%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 10.8%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 25.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 127.5%), professional degree (6.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 67.0%), and doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 65.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 2.1%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 0.92%, a difference of 43.0%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 21.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (11.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 1.3%), disability (11.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 4.3%).