Latvian vs Yaqui Community Comparison
COMPARE
Latvian
Yaqui
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Latvians
Yaqui
9,576
SOCIAL INDEX
93.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
12th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,558
SOCIAL INDEX
13.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
299th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Yaqui Integration in Latvian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 71,251,290 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Yaqui within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.133. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.056% in Yaqui. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 56.2 Yaqui.
Latvian vs Yaqui Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Yaqui communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,649 compared to $36,112, a difference of 45.8%), median family income ($120,301 compared to $87,289, a difference of 37.8%), and median male earnings ($63,498 compared to $46,777, a difference of 35.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $48,300, a difference of 9.3%), wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 15.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($67,326 compared to $56,417, a difference of 19.3%).
Income Metric | Latvian | Yaqui |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $52,649 | Tragic $36,112 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $120,301 | Tragic $87,289 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $97,311 | Tragic $74,596 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $53,001 | Tragic $40,647 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $63,498 | Tragic $46,777 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $43,941 | Tragic $34,943 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Excellent $52,783 | Tragic $48,300 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $108,926 | Tragic $81,656 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $115,957 | Tragic $86,914 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $67,326 | Tragic $56,417 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.9% | Exceptional 24.0% |
Latvian vs Yaqui Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Yaqui communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 62.2%), family poverty (7.1% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 60.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (13.4% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 54.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.5% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 5.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 12.3%), and single male poverty (12.7% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 12.4%).
Poverty Metric | Latvian | Yaqui |
Poverty | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 15.1% |
Families | Exceptional 7.1% | Tragic 11.3% |
Males | Exceptional 9.6% | Tragic 13.7% |
Females | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 16.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.5% | Tragic 21.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.8% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.5% | Tragic 21.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.2% | Tragic 20.4% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.4% | Tragic 20.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.5% | Tragic 20.3% |
Single Males | Good 12.7% | Tragic 14.2% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.0% | Tragic 24.9% |
Single Fathers | Fair 16.5% | Exceptional 15.6% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.9% | Tragic 33.1% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 3.9% | Tragic 6.3% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.5% | Tragic 11.9% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.8% | Fair 12.5% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.1% | Tragic 13.9% |
Latvian vs Yaqui Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Yaqui communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 35.0%), female unemployment (4.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 28.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.030%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.73%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 1.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Latvian | Yaqui |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.8% |
Males | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 5.7% |
Females | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 6.0% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.0% | Tragic 11.9% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Tragic 19.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 4.7% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Good 4.8% | Excellent 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 5.5% |
Seniors > 75 | Excellent 8.6% | Tragic 9.4% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.8% | Tragic 8.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 6.6% |
Latvian vs Yaqui Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Yaqui communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 6.2%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.0% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 0.71%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 63.0%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 4.8%).
Labor Participation Metric | Latvian | Yaqui |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Excellent 65.5% | Tragic 63.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.5% | Tragic 76.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.9% | Good 37.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.1% | Excellent 75.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 86.1% | Tragic 82.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 86.0% | Tragic 81.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.4% | Tragic 80.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.8% | Tragic 78.9% |
Latvian vs Yaqui Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Yaqui communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 59.1%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 40.7%), and births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 38.8%, a difference of 40.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.8% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 4.6%), average family size (3.11 compared to 3.32, a difference of 7.1%), and married-couple households (47.9% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 7.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Latvian | Yaqui |
Family Households | Tragic 62.8% | Exceptional 65.6% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.4% | Exceptional 29.1% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 47.9% | Tragic 44.5% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.11 | Exceptional 3.32 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 3.2% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 7.4% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.5% | Tragic 43.4% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 13.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 27.7% | Tragic 38.8% |
Latvian vs Yaqui Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Yaqui communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 32.7%), no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 30.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 5.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 18.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Latvian | Yaqui |
No Vehicles Available | Excellent 9.8% | Exceptional 7.5% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 90.3% | Exceptional 92.6% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 56.2% | Exceptional 59.3% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.3% | Exceptional 22.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Fair 6.1% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Latvian vs Yaqui Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Yaqui communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 97.8%), master's degree (19.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 80.0%), and doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 74.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.94%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.94%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.97%).
Education Level Metric | Latvian | Yaqui |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Tragic 2.4% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.6% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.3% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 96.9% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 96.7% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 96.3% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.2% | Tragic 94.6% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.0% | Tragic 94.2% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Tragic 92.9% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.6% | Tragic 91.1% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.7% | Tragic 89.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.6% | Tragic 87.5% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 92.0% | Tragic 84.7% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 89.2% | Tragic 80.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 71.6% | Tragic 60.2% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 66.1% | Tragic 53.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 53.9% | Tragic 37.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 46.1% | Tragic 29.0% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 19.8% | Tragic 11.0% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 3.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.6% | Tragic 1.5% |
Latvian vs Yaqui Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Yaqui communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 32.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 28.9%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 7.7%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 8.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 8.8%).
Disability Metric | Latvian | Yaqui |
Disability | Excellent 11.4% | Tragic 13.1% |
Males | Good 11.1% | Tragic 12.9% |
Females | Exceptional 11.7% | Tragic 13.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.3% | Good 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Poor 6.8% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 13.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.2% | Tragic 27.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.1% | Tragic 49.8% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.5% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 3.4% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.6% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.7% | Tragic 6.8% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.7% |