Latvian vs Macedonian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Latvian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Macedonian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Latvians

Macedonians

Exceptional
Excellent
9,576
SOCIAL INDEX
93.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
12th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,797
SOCIAL INDEX
85.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
47th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Macedonian Integration in Latvian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 94,510,935 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Macedonians within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.211. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.095% in Macedonians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 95.0 Macedonians.
Latvian Integration in Macedonian Communities

Latvian vs Macedonian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,649 compared to $47,573, a difference of 10.7%), median family income ($120,301 compared to $109,668, a difference of 9.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($67,326 compared to $61,564, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 2.5%), householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $54,563, a difference of 3.4%), and median earnings ($53,001 compared to $49,893, a difference of 6.2%).
Latvian vs Macedonian Income
Income MetricLatvianMacedonian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$52,649
Exceptional
$47,573
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$120,301
Exceptional
$109,668
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$97,311
Exceptional
$90,761
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$53,001
Exceptional
$49,893
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$63,498
Exceptional
$59,522
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,941
Exceptional
$41,286
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Excellent
$52,783
Exceptional
$54,563
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$108,926
Exceptional
$101,882
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$115,957
Exceptional
$107,074
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$67,326
Good
$61,564
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.9%
Tragic
28.6%

Latvian vs Macedonian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 13.8%), child poverty among boys under 16 (13.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 9.8%), and family poverty (7.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (19.0% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 0.19%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and male poverty (9.6% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 1.7%).
Latvian vs Macedonian Poverty
Poverty MetricLatvianMacedonian
Poverty
Exceptional
10.5%
Exceptional
10.8%
Families
Exceptional
7.1%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Exceptional
9.6%
Exceptional
9.7%
Females
Exceptional
11.4%
Exceptional
11.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.5%
Exceptional
18.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.8%
Exceptional
11.9%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Exceptional
15.8%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.2%
Exceptional
14.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.4%
Exceptional
14.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.5%
Exceptional
14.7%
Single Males
Good
12.7%
Fair
12.9%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.0%
Exceptional
18.9%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Tragic
17.7%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.9%
Exceptional
27.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.9%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.5%
Exceptional
9.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Exceptional
11.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.1%
Exceptional
9.9%

Latvian vs Macedonian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 12.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 9.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.35%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.75%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.95%).
Latvian vs Macedonian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLatvianMacedonian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.7%
Excellent
5.1%
Males
Exceptional
4.8%
Good
5.2%
Females
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
5.1%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.0%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Exceptional
16.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Average
5.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Excellent
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Good
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Good
4.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Excellent
8.6%
Tragic
9.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.8%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.9%
Excellent
5.3%

Latvian vs Macedonian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (86.0% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.70%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.60%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 76.0%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.18%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.30%).
Latvian vs Macedonian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLatvianMacedonian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.5%
Average
65.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.5%
Exceptional
80.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.9%
Exceptional
37.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.1%
Exceptional
76.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.1%
Exceptional
85.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
86.0%
Exceptional
85.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.4%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.8%
Exceptional
83.5%

Latvian vs Macedonian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.1%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and family households (62.8% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.4% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 0.080%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.31%), and currently married (48.5% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 0.40%).
Latvian vs Macedonian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLatvianMacedonian
Family Households
Tragic
62.8%
Tragic
63.7%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.4%
Tragic
26.4%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.9%
Exceptional
47.6%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.11
Tragic
3.13
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.4%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.5%
Exceptional
48.3%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.7%
Exceptional
27.9%

Latvian vs Macedonian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 24.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 11.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 2.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 53.3%, a difference of 5.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 8.8%).
Latvian vs Macedonian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLatvianMacedonian
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.8%
Tragic
12.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.3%
Tragic
87.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
56.2%
Tragic
53.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.3%
Tragic
17.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.1%
Tragic
5.5%

Latvian vs Macedonian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 37.9%), professional degree (6.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 31.3%), and master's degree (19.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.21%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.22%), and 2nd grade (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.22%).
Latvian vs Macedonian Education Level
Education Level MetricLatvianMacedonian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
97.9%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Exceptional
97.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Exceptional
96.7%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
96.0%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.6%
Exceptional
95.2%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.7%
Exceptional
94.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.6%
Exceptional
92.9%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
92.0%
Exceptional
91.1%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
89.2%
Exceptional
88.1%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
71.6%
Exceptional
67.6%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.1%
Exceptional
61.8%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
53.9%
Exceptional
49.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
46.1%
Exceptional
41.4%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
19.8%
Exceptional
16.7%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.2%
Excellent
4.8%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.6%
Good
1.9%

Latvian vs Macedonian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 8.4%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 5.2%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.060%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 0.50%), and disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 0.59%).
Latvian vs Macedonian Disability
Disability MetricLatvianMacedonian
Disability
Excellent
11.4%
Exceptional
11.4%
Males
Good
11.1%
Excellent
11.0%
Females
Exceptional
11.7%
Exceptional
11.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Average
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Poor
6.8%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.2%
Exceptional
10.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.2%
Exceptional
21.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.1%
Exceptional
45.4%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Fair
3.1%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.6%
Exceptional
16.5%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.7%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.4%