Latvian vs Lebanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 198,883,224 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Lebanese within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.130. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.045% in Lebanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 44.7 Lebanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Lebanese communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,649 compared to $45,840, a difference of 14.8%), median family income ($120,301 compared to $107,086, a difference of 12.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($108,926 compared to $97,339, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 0.0%), householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $50,355, a difference of 4.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($67,326 compared to $62,287, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Lebanese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 38.3%), family poverty (7.1% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 26.0%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (13.4% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 3.7%), single male poverty (12.7% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 4.5%), and single father poverty (16.5% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Lebanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 15.3%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 12.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.12%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Lebanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.0% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 0.83%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 0.99%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Lebanese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 11.3%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 7.0%), and births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.9% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 0.11%), currently married (48.5% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Lebanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 13.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 4.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 1.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 2.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Lebanese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 25.5%), professional degree (6.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 24.2%), and no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.35%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.35%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Lebanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 10.7%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 8.9%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 0.040%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 0.35%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 0.69%).