Latvian vs Immigrants from Oceania Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,799,951 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.446. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.351% in Immigrants from Oceania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 350.6 Immigrants from Oceania.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,649 compared to $45,220, a difference of 16.4%), median male earnings ($63,498 compared to $55,712, a difference of 14.0%), and median family income ($120,301 compared to $106,453, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $53,680, a difference of 1.7%), householder income over 65 years ($67,326 compared to $64,416, a difference of 4.5%), and wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 28.8%), receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 24.8%), and family poverty (7.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 1.4%), single male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and single father poverty (16.5% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 14.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 10.6%), and unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.20%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.24%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (86.0% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 0.060%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 22.6%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 18.8%), and births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.9% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 2.1%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.8%), and family households (62.8% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 24.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 13.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.020%), no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 0.60%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 45.5%), professional degree (6.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 36.7%), and master's degree (19.8% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 35.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.72%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.72%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 12.9%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 12.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 0.57%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.82%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 2.5%).