Latvian vs Pennsylvania German Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 133,052,737 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Pennsylvania Germans within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.651. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.513% in Pennsylvania Germans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 513.1 Pennsylvania Germans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,649 compared to $37,842, a difference of 39.1%), median family income ($120,301 compared to $91,763, a difference of 31.1%), and median household income ($97,311 compared to $75,814, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $50,852, a difference of 3.8%), wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 10.2%), and median earnings ($53,001 compared to $42,615, a difference of 24.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.5% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 36.4%), child poverty among boys under 16 (13.4% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 33.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.2% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 32.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 0.97%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 4.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 59.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 28.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.57%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.61%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 19.4%), in labor force | age 30-34 (86.0% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 78.4%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 22.6%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 22.0%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.5% compared to 49.6%, a difference of 2.3%), average family size (3.11 compared to 3.19, a difference of 2.9%), and family households with children (26.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 24.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 15.9%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 1.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 58.5%, a difference of 4.0%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 12.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 110.1%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 86.6%), and master's degree (19.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 84.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.11%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.11%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.11%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 48.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 26.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.36%), disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 4.5%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 7.2%).