Latvian vs Aleut Community Comparison

COMPARE

Latvian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Aleut
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Latvians

Aleuts

Exceptional
Fair
9,576
SOCIAL INDEX
93.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
12th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,609
SOCIAL INDEX
33.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
216th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Aleut Integration in Latvian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 49,477,577 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Aleuts within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.768. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.215% in Aleuts. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 1,214.9 Aleuts.
Latvian Integration in Aleut Communities

Latvian vs Aleut Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Aleut communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,649 compared to $42,210, a difference of 24.7%), median male earnings ($63,498 compared to $51,168, a difference of 24.1%), and median family income ($120,301 compared to $98,702, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $50,377, a difference of 4.8%), householder income over 65 years ($67,326 compared to $62,708, a difference of 7.4%), and median female earnings ($43,941 compared to $38,719, a difference of 13.5%).
Latvian vs Aleut Income
Income MetricLatvianAleut
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$52,649
Poor
$42,210
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$120,301
Poor
$98,702
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$97,311
Fair
$83,446
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$53,001
Tragic
$44,241
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$63,498
Tragic
$51,168
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,941
Poor
$38,719
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Excellent
$52,783
Tragic
$50,377
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$108,926
Poor
$91,370
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$115,957
Average
$100,052
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$67,326
Excellent
$62,708
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.9%
Exceptional
23.7%

Latvian vs Aleut Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Aleut communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.5% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 39.7%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.8% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 36.3%), and receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 35.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 0.32%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 6.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 7.5%).
Latvian vs Aleut Poverty
Poverty MetricLatvianAleut
Poverty
Exceptional
10.5%
Fair
12.5%
Families
Exceptional
7.1%
Poor
9.5%
Males
Exceptional
9.6%
Poor
11.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.4%
Average
13.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.5%
Tragic
20.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.8%
Tragic
16.1%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Tragic
20.3%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.2%
Poor
17.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.4%
Tragic
17.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.5%
Fair
16.9%
Single Males
Good
12.7%
Tragic
15.4%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.0%
Tragic
25.4%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Fair
16.4%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.9%
Tragic
32.9%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.9%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.5%
Exceptional
10.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Exceptional
11.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.1%
Poor
12.4%

Latvian vs Aleut Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Aleut communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 56.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 41.8%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 41.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 10.8%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 11.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 12.1%).
Latvian vs Aleut Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLatvianAleut
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
6.1%
Males
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.8%
Females
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.5%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
14.1%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Tragic
21.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
9.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Good
4.8%
Tragic
6.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.0%
Seniors > 75
Excellent
8.6%
Tragic
10.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.8%
Good
7.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
9.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.9%
Average
5.4%

Latvian vs Aleut Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Aleut communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (86.0% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 4.2%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 0.73%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 2.9%).
Latvian vs Aleut Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLatvianAleut
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.5%
Exceptional
66.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.5%
Tragic
78.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.9%
Exceptional
40.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.1%
Exceptional
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.1%
Tragic
83.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
86.0%
Tragic
82.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.4%
Average
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.8%
Tragic
81.0%

Latvian vs Aleut Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Aleut communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 51.8%), births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 39.3%, a difference of 41.9%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.8% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 1.1%), family households with children (26.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 3.7%), and currently married (48.5% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 3.9%).
Latvian vs Aleut Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLatvianAleut
Family Households
Tragic
62.8%
Tragic
63.4%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.4%
Average
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.9%
Poor
45.6%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.11
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
3.0%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
6.8%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.5%
Average
46.7%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
12.5%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.7%
Tragic
39.3%

Latvian vs Aleut Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Aleut communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 33.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 12.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 87.5%, a difference of 3.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 4.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 4.6%).
Latvian vs Aleut Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLatvianAleut
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.8%
Tragic
13.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.3%
Tragic
87.5%
2+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
56.2%
Tragic
54.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.3%
Excellent
20.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.1%
Exceptional
6.9%

Latvian vs Aleut Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Aleut communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 75.1%), professional degree (6.2% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 72.7%), and master's degree (19.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 67.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.0%), 5th grade (98.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and 3rd grade (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.11%).
Latvian vs Aleut Education Level
Education Level MetricLatvianAleut
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.7%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.6%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.6%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.5%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
97.7%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Exceptional
96.9%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
96.0%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.6%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.7%
Exceptional
93.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.6%
Exceptional
92.1%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
92.0%
Exceptional
90.4%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
89.2%
Average
85.6%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
71.6%
Tragic
62.2%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.1%
Tragic
55.4%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
53.9%
Tragic
39.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
46.1%
Tragic
31.3%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
19.8%
Tragic
11.8%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
3.6%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.6%
Tragic
1.5%

Latvian vs Aleut Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Aleut communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 36.0%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 34.0%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 33.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.1%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and female disability (11.7% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 8.3%).
Latvian vs Aleut Disability
Disability MetricLatvianAleut
Disability
Excellent
11.4%
Tragic
13.1%
Males
Good
11.1%
Tragic
13.5%
Females
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
12.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Poor
6.8%
Tragic
8.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.2%
Tragic
28.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.1%
Tragic
50.6%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.6%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
4.3%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.6%
Excellent
17.0%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.7%
Tragic
6.6%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.8%