Latvian vs Venezuelan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 166,729,597 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Venezuelans within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.232. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.064% in Venezuelans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to a decrease of 64.2 Venezuelans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Venezuelan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,649 compared to $42,074, a difference of 25.1%), median family income ($120,301 compared to $96,281, a difference of 24.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($108,926 compared to $88,232, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $50,011, a difference of 5.5%), wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 5.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($67,326 compared to $58,026, a difference of 16.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Venezuelan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 47.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 32.6%), and receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 32.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.5% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.98%), single male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and single mother poverty (26.9% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Venezuelan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 18.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 13.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.070%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.10%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Venezuelan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 14.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.0% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.19%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.60%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Venezuelan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 25.7%), births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 14.2%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.9% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 0.55%), currently married (48.5% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 2.9%), and average family size (3.11 compared to 3.25, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Venezuelan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 20.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 14.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 0.20%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Venezuelan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 47.8%), no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 28.8%), and professional degree (6.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.50%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.51%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Venezuelan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 21.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 18.2%), and male disability (11.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.18%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.51%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 2.3%).